Savitaben Babubhai Jadav vs Harunbhai Gulamnabibhai Vhora

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6756 Guj
Judgement Date : 18 September, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Savitaben Babubhai Jadav vs Harunbhai Gulamnabibhai Vhora on 18 September, 2025

                                                                                                             NEUTRAL CITATION




                             C/CA/4155/2025                                   ORDER DATED: 18/09/2025

                                                                                                              undefined




                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                      R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 4155
                                               of 2025

                                          In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 23630 of 2025

                      ==========================================================
                                         SAVITABEN BABUBHAI JADAV & ANR.
                                                      Versus
                                      HARUNBHAI GULAMNABIBHAI VHORA & ANR.
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MS POOJA H HOTCHANDANI(7765) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2
                      MS SEJAL K MANDAVIA(436) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
                      NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                        CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI

                                                         Date : 18/09/2025

                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. The present application has been preferred for seeking condonation of delay of 188 days caused in preferring the appeal against the impugned judgment and award dated 18.10.2024 passed in M.A.C.P. No.310 of 2024.

2. Heard learned advocates for the applicant.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that owing to the poverty of the applicants, they could not prefer the appeal within the period of limitation and a reasonable amount of time was consumed in arranging the requisite court fees and other expenses for preferring the appeal. Therefore, a delay of 188 days has occurred in filing the appeal.

Page 1 of 2 Uploaded by MR.CHIRAG DESHRAJ PAL(HCD0072) on Sat Sep 20 2025 Downloaded on : Mon Sep 22 22:29:35 IST 2025

NEUTRAL CITATION C/CA/4155/2025 ORDER DATED: 18/09/2025 undefined

4. All the respondents have been duly served but they have chosen not no appear before the Court.

5. Having considered the submissions of the learned advocates for the parties and having regard to the poverty of the applicants, who could not arrange the necessary funds for preferring an appeal within the period of limitation, in my considered opinion, constitutes a sufficient ground for condoning the delay. Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the present case and in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag & Anr. v. MST. Katiji & Ors. [AIR 1987 SC 1353], the delay of 188 days caused in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned. The present Civil Application stands allowed. There shall be no order as to costs.

(MOOL CHAND TYAGI, J) CDP Page 2 of 2 Uploaded by MR.CHIRAG DESHRAJ PAL(HCD0072) on Sat Sep 20 2025 Downloaded on : Mon Sep 22 22:29:35 IST 2025