Gujarat High Court
Srei Equipment Finance Limited vs Office Of The Principal Commissioner , ... on 11 September, 2025
Author: Bhargav D. Karia
Bench: Bhargav D. Karia
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10016 of 2025
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANAV TRIVEDI
================================================================
Approved for Reporting Yes No
No
================================================================
SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED
Versus
OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER , CENTRAL GST AND
CENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE & ORS.
================================================================
Appearance:
MR PAVAN S GODIAWALA(2936) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR PRADIP D BHATE(1523) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
MS. KETKI P JHA(9864) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANAV TRIVEDI
Date : 11/09/2025
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) Heard learned advocate Mr.Pavan S. Godiawala for the petitioner, learned advocate Ms.Ketki P. Jha for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 and learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms.Shrunjal Shah for the respondent No.3. Page 1 of 10 Uploaded by PALAK BRAHMBHATT(HC01391) on Wed Sep 17 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 17 21:50:02 IST 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025 undefined
1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Ms.Ketki Jha waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 and learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms.Shrunjal Shah waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.3.
2.1. Learned advocate Mr.Pavan Godiawala for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has challenged the Order-in- Original dated dated 26th February, 2025 passed by the respondent No.2-Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Unit-8, Ahmedabad under Section 73 of the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
2.2. It was submitted that the petitioner- Company is a Non-Banking Finance Company Page 2 of 10 Uploaded by PALAK BRAHMBHATT(HC01391) on Wed Sep 17 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 17 21:50:02 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025 undefined engaged in the business of equipment financing logistic solutions, etc. and by order dated 08.10.2021 passed by the NCLT, Kolkatta Bench, CIRP was initiated against the SREI Infrastructure Finance Limited (SIFL). 2.3. Learned advocate Mr.Pavan Godiawala submitted that a Resolution plan submitted by National Asset Reconstruction Company Limited for the Corporate Debtors came to be approved under Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 vide order dated 11.08.2023 passed by the NCLT, Kolkatta.
3. The National Company Law Tribunal, by order dated 11th August, 2023 held as under :
"115. We have perused the reliefs, waivers and concessions as sought and as given in Section 10 at Pages 105-115 of the Resolution Plan. While some of Page 3 of 10 Uploaded by PALAK BRAHMBHATT(HC01391) on Wed Sep 17 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 17 21:50:02 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025 undefined the reliefs, waivers and concessions sought by the Resolution Applicant come within the purview of the Code while many others fall under the power and jurisdiction of different government authorities/departments. This Adjudicating Authority has power to grant reliefs, waivers and concessions only in relation to the Code and the Companies Act 2013 (within the powers of the NCLT) for achieving the objective of the Code. No reliefs, waivers and concessions that fall within the domain of other government department/authorities are granted. The reliefs, waivers and concessions that pertain to other governmental authorities/departments shall be dealt with the respective competent authorities/forums/offices, Government or Semi Government of the State or Central Government with regard to the respective reliefs, waivers and concessions. The competent authorities including the Appellate authorities may consider grant such reliefs, waivers Page 4 of 10 Uploaded by PALAK BRAHMBHATT(HC01391) on Wed Sep 17 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 17 21:50:02 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025 undefined and concessions keeping in view the spirit of the Code.
118. With respect to the waivers with regard to extinguishment of claims which arose Pre-CIRP and which have not been claimed are granted in terms of Ghanashyam Mishra and Sons Pvt Ltd v Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that once a resolution plan is duly approved by the Adjudicating Authority under sub-section (1) of section 31, the claims as provided in the resolution plan shall stand frozen and will be binding on the Corporate Debtor and its employees, members, creditors, including the Central Govt, any State Govt or any local authority, guarantors and other stakeholders. We place reliance on the recent judgement of Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan in the matter of EMC v. State of Rajasthan wherein it has been inter-alia held that :Page 5 of 10 Uploaded by PALAK BRAHMBHATT(HC01391) on Wed Sep 17 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 17 21:50:02 IST 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025 undefined "Law is well-settled that with the finalization of insolvency resolution plan and the approval thereof by the NCLT, all dues of creditors, Corporate, Statutory and others stand extinguished and no demand can be raised for the period prior to the specified date."
On the date of approval of resolution plan by the Adjudicating Authority, all such claims, which are not a part of resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim, which is not part of the resolution plan. The Hon'ble Supreme Court also held that all the dues including the statutory dues owed to the Central Govt, any State Govt or any local authority, if not part of the resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no proceedings in respect of such dues for the period prior to the date on which the Page 6 of 10 Uploaded by PALAK BRAHMBHATT(HC01391) on Wed Sep 17 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 17 21:50:02 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025 undefined Adjudicating Authority grants its approval under section 31 could be continued."
4. In view of the above observation made by the NCLT, the respondent-Authority could not have issued the notice as held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Ghanashyam Mishra and Sons Pvt. Ltd. Versus Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd reported in 2021 9 SCC 657 as under :
"102. In the result, we answer the questions framed by us as under:
102.1. That once a resolution plan is duly approved by the adjudicating authority under sub-section (1) of Section 31, the claims as provided in the resolution plan shall stand frozen and will be binding on the corporate debtor and its employees, members, creditors, including the Central Government, any State Government or any Page 7 of 10 Uploaded by PALAK BRAHMBHATT(HC01391) on Wed Sep 17 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 17 21:50:02 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025 undefined local authority, guarantors and other stakeholders. On the date of approval of resolution plan by the adjudicating authority, all such claims, which are not a part of resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no person will be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim, which is not part of the resolution plan.
102.2. The 2019 Amendment to Section 31 of the I&B Code is clarificatory and declaratory in nature and therefore will be effective from the date on which the I&B Code has come into effect.
102.3. Consequently all the dues including the statutory dues owed to the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority, if not part of the resolution plan, shall stand extinguished and no proceedings in respect of such dues for the period prior to the date on which the Page 8 of 10 Uploaded by PALAK BRAHMBHATT(HC01391) on Wed Sep 17 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 17 21:50:02 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025 undefined adjudicating authority grants its approval under Section 31 could be continued."
5. Considering the above decision as well as the order passed by the NCLT, the impugned order dated 26th February, 2025 passed by the respondent No.2 would not survive as the same is passed for Financial Year 2021 raising the demand under the GST Act which is prior to the date of the order of the NCLT passed on 11th August, 2023 approving the Resolution Plan wherein, the NCLT has held that on the date of approval of the Resolution Plan, all claims which are not part of the Resolution Plan shall stand extinguished and no person would be entitled to initiate or continue any proceedings in respect to a claim which is not part of the Resolution Plan.
Page 9 of 10 Uploaded by PALAK BRAHMBHATT(HC01391) on Wed Sep 17 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 17 21:50:02 IST 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/10016/2025 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/09/2025 undefined
6. Therefore, no demand can be raised for the period prior to the specified date/date of approval of the Resolution Plan. The respondent-Authority therefore could not have conducted the proceedings under the provisions of the GST Act for the Financial Year 2021 raising the demand by passing the impugned Order-in-Original on 26th February, 2025.
7. The petition therefore succeeds and is accordingly allowed. The impugned order dated 26th February, 2025 is hereby quashed and set aside. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. No orders as to cost.
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J) (PRANAV TRIVEDI,J) PALAK Page 10 of 10 Uploaded by PALAK BRAHMBHATT(HC01391) on Wed Sep 17 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 17 21:50:02 IST 2025