Dhanjibhai Thakarshibhai Borda vs Surat Municipal Corporation

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6495 Guj
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Dhanjibhai Thakarshibhai Borda vs Surat Municipal Corporation on 11 September, 2025

Author: Sunita Agarwal
Bench: Sunita Agarwal
                                                                                                                NEUTRAL CITATION




                              C/LPA/681/2024                                   ORDER DATED: 11/09/2025

                                                                                                                undefined




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                 R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 681 of 2024
                             In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 21680 of 2023
                                                   With
                                CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2024
                                In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 681 of 2024
                       =============================================
                                     DHANJIBHAI THAKARSHIBHAI BORDA & ORS.
                                                     Versus
                                      SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.
                       =============================================
                       Appearance:
                       MR MIHIR THAKORE, SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH MR DIPAN
                       DESAI(2481) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
                       MR RR MARSHALL, SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH MR DAIFRAZ
                       HAVEWALLA(3982) for the Respondent(s) No. 3,4
                       MR KAUSHAL D PANDYA(2905) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
                       =============================================

                        CORAM:HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE
                              SUNITA AGARWAL
                              and
                              HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.N.RAY

                                       Date : 11/09/2025
                                         ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL)

1. Heard Mr.Mihir Thakore, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr.Dipan Desai, learned advocate appearing for the appellant, Mr.R.R.Marshall, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr.Daifraz Havewalla, learned advocate appearing for respondent Nos.3 and 4 and Mr.Kaushal D. Pandya, learned advocate appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2.

2. Having heard learned Senior Counsels appearing for the parties and perused the record, pertinent is to note that from the perusal of the judgment impugned passed by the learned Page 1 of 3 Uploaded by GAURAV J THAKER(HC00951) on Fri Sep 12 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Sep 13 05:48:44 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/LPA/681/2024 ORDER DATED: 11/09/2025 undefined Single Judge, it is evident that the intricate questions of right, title and interest in the land in question are subject-matter of adjudication before the Civil Court in the pending civil suit filed by the appellant herein.

3. The observations in this regard in paragraph 13.2 of the order of the learned Single Judge are relevant to be noted hereinunder :

"13.2 Considering the aforesaid provisions, in the facts of the present case, while granting the development permission, the competent authority is not required to go into the title, ownership and easement rights of the respondent Nos.3 to 7, however, in the interest of justice and upon undertaking given by the respondent Nos.3 to 7 on 04.01.2022, the development permission is granted and that, the parties would be governed by the final outcome of the civil suit. Even while rejecting the objections raised by the petitioner herein, the competent authority has taken due care that the development permission is subject to the final title rights that may be determined in the civil suit being Special Civil Suit No.87 of 2018, which is pending before the competent Civil Court."

4. Taking note of the above, we find it fit and proper not to interfere in the decision of the learned Single Judge leaving it open for the parties to agitate their rights in the pending civil suit.

5. It is further clarified that the Civil Court shall decide the matter independently without being influenced by any of the observations made in the judgment impugned passed by the learned Single Judge or any observations made in the orders passed by the Municipal Authorities in the matters subjected to challenge before the Court.

Page 2 of 3 Uploaded by GAURAV J THAKER(HC00951) on Fri Sep 12 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Sep 13 05:48:44 IST 2025

NEUTRAL CITATION C/LPA/681/2024 ORDER DATED: 11/09/2025 undefined

6. We may further note that the suit is of the year 2018, wherein relief for partition has been claimed. We only observe that an endeavor be made by the Civil Court to decide the suit as expeditiously as possible.

7. With the above, the present appeal stands disposed of. Consequently, connected Civil Application also stands disposed of.

(SUNITA AGARWAL, CJ ) (D.N.RAY, J) GAURAV J THAKER Page 3 of 3 Uploaded by GAURAV J THAKER(HC00951) on Fri Sep 12 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Sep 13 05:48:44 IST 2025