Gujarat High Court
Lalitaben Mangalsinh Rathwa vs Khumansingh Lakhabhai Bariya on 8 September, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/380/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 08/09/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 380 of 2023
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
==========================================================
Approved for Reporting Yes No
No
==========================================================
LALITABEN MANGALSINH RATHWA
Versus
KHUMANSINGH LAKHABHAI BARIYA & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. MOHSIN KHAN FOR MR. SABIR B SAIYYAD(6322) for the Appellant(s)
No. 1
MASUMI V NANAVATY(9321) for the Defendant(s) No. 3
MR VIBHUTI NANAVATI(513) for the Defendant(s) No. 3
RULE UNSERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 1,2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 08/09/2025
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Mohsin Khan, who has appeared through virtual mode for and on behalf Mr. Sabir B. Saiyyad, learned advocate on record for the appellant-original claimant, and learned advocate Ms. Masumi V. Nanavaty, who has entered her appearance on behalf of respondent no.3-Insurance Company. Page 1 of 10 Uploaded by SUYASH KUMAR SRIVASTVA(HC01570) on Tue Sep 09 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 10 00:14:18 IST 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/380/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 08/09/2025 undefined
2. The present appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, at the instance of the original claimant, being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and award dated 15.06.2021 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi) & 8th Additional District Judge, Limkheda, District-Dahod in M.A.C.P. No.948 of 2017.
2.1 By the said impugned judgment and award, the Tribunal has partly allowed the claim petition preferred by the present appellant- original claimant under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, holding the appellant-original claimant entitled to recover an amount of Rs.80,000/- as compensation from the original opponents- respondents herein, who are held jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation with proportionate costs and interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition, till its actual realization.
3. Considering the grounds raised in the appeal, the Co-ordinate Bench, vide order dated 08.02.2023, noticing the limited issue of amount of compensation being determined on lower side, despite settled principles of law, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mallikarjun Vs. Divisional Manager, The National Page 2 of 10 Uploaded by SUYASH KUMAR SRIVASTVA(HC01570) on Tue Sep 09 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 10 00:14:18 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/380/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 08/09/2025 undefined Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr., reported in 2014 (14) SCC, 396, has admitted the appeal.
4. Learned advocates appearing for the respective parties have urged this Court to take up the matter for final hearing, in absence of respondent nos.1 and 2. The board endorsement shows that the aforesaid respondents are not served, as they are not found at the given address. Noticing the limited issue involved, the matter was heard peremptorily.
5. Learned advocate appearing for the appellant- original claimant has placed reliance upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mallikarjun (supra), and has submitted that the Tribunal miserably erred in determining the amount of compensation confining it to Rs.80,000/- as against the claim of Rs.3 Lakhs. Learned advocate has further submitted that the Tribunal ought to have appreciated the nature of injury and the disability sustained, as is evident from the medical case papers produced on record at Exh.30. Looking to the disability to the extent of 20% of body as a whole, in light of the settled legal principles, the Tribunal ought to have considered awarding lump sum amount of compensation of Rs.3 Lakhs towards pain, shock and suffering as well as mental and physical shock, Page 3 of 10 Uploaded by SUYASH KUMAR SRIVASTVA(HC01570) on Tue Sep 09 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 10 00:14:18 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/380/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 08/09/2025 undefined hardship, inconvenience, and the loss of amenities of life on account of permanent disability sustained.
5.1 Learned advocate appearing for the appellant has not disputed the amount of compensation being awarded by the Tribunal under the heads of medical expenses, pain, shock and suffering and attendance, special diet and transportation charges are concerned. He has, therefore, urged this Court to enhance the amount of compensation to the tune of Rs.3,35,000/-, which may be awarded with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition, till its actual realization.
6. Per contra, learned advocate Ms. Masumi Nanavaty appearing for the respondent no.3-Insurance Company has vehemently objected to the aforesaid submissions. Learned advocate, at the outset, has invited my attention to the final award drawn by the Tribunal, and has submitted that the Tribunal committed grave error in awarding 8% compound interest on the amount of compensation of Rs.80,000/-, as determined. The reliance was placed on the provisions of Section 171 of the Act, 1988, to contend that that at the most, the Tribunal could have considered awarding simple interest on the aforesaid amount of compensation. As regards the submission made by learned advocate Page 4 of 10 Uploaded by SUYASH KUMAR SRIVASTVA(HC01570) on Tue Sep 09 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 10 00:14:18 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/380/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 08/09/2025 undefined for the appellant on the amount of compensation prayed for towards the pain, shock and suffering, mental and physical hardship, and loss of amenities on account of permanent disability is concerned, learned advocate has urged this Court to confine it to total amount of compensation by awarding lump sum compensation of Rs.3 Lakhs. She has, therefore, urged this Court to pass appropriate orders, in this regard.
7. Having heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and considering their submissions in light of the findings and reasons assigned by the Tribunal, in light of judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mallikarjun (supra), the Tribunal committed grave error in confining the amount of compensation under the head of future loss of income is concerned to the tune of Rs.45,000/- only. Admittedly, in absence of any challenge being made to the issue of negligency and the liability as determined by the Tribunal, at the instance of the present respondents, the foundational facts have remained uncontroverted. It is evident from the record, more particularly, the disability certificate produced on record, the original claimant has sustained disability of 20% of body as a whole.
Page 5 of 10 Uploaded by SUYASH KUMAR SRIVASTVA(HC01570) on Tue Sep 09 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 10 00:14:18 IST 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/380/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 08/09/2025 undefined
8. At this stage, it would be appropriate to reproduce the relevant observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mallikarjun (supra), which read as under:
"12. Though it is difficult to have an accurate assessment of the compensation in the case of children suffering disability on account of a motor vehicle accident, having regard to the relevant factors, precedents and the approach of various High Courts, we are of the view that the appropriate compensation on all other heads in addition to the actual expenditure for treatment, attendant, etc., should be, if the disability is above 10% and upto 30% to the whole body, Rs.3 lakhs; upto 60%, Rs.4 lakhs; upto 90%, Rs.5 lakhs and above 90%, it should be Rs.6 lakhs. For permanent disability upto 10%, it should be Re.1 lakh, unless there are exceptional circumstances to take different yardstick. In the instant case, the disability is to the tune of 18%. Appellant had a longer period of hospitalization for about two months causing also inconvenience and loss of earning to the parents."
13. The appellant, hence, would be entitled to get the compensation as follows :-
HEAD COMPENSATION
AMOUNT
Pain and suffering already undergone Rs. 3,00,000/-
and to be suffered in future, mental and
physical shock, hardship, inconvenience, and discomforts, etc., and loss of amenities in life on account of Page 6 of 10 Uploaded by SUYASH KUMAR SRIVASTVA(HC01570) on Tue Sep 09 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 10 00:14:18 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/380/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 08/09/2025 undefined permanent disability.
Discomfort, inconvenience and loss of Rs. 25,000/ earnings to the parents during the period of hospitalization.
Medical and incidental expenses during Rs. 25,000/- the period of hospitalization for 58 days.
Future medical expenses for correction Rs. 25,000/- of the mal union of fracture and incidental expenses for such treatment.
TOTAL:- Rs. 3,75,000/-
9. Thus, in light of the aforesaid principles and the undisputed facts as evident on record, the Tribunal ought to have considered lump sum amount of compensation to the tune of Rs.3 Lakhs towards the heads of pain, shock and suffering, mental and physical shock, hardship, inconvenience, and discomforts, etc., and loss of amenities in life on account of permanent disability to the tune of Rs. 3 Lakhs.
10. As rightly pointed out by the learned advocate for the appellant, the Tribunal having appreciated the evidence brought on record, has awarded the amount of compensation separately under the heads of medical expenses; pain, shock and suffering; attendance and special diet and transportation charges. In absence of any substantial appeal Page 7 of 10 Uploaded by SUYASH KUMAR SRIVASTVA(HC01570) on Tue Sep 09 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 10 00:14:18 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/380/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 08/09/2025 undefined being filed at the instance of the respondent-Insurance Company, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the aforesaid amount being awarded individually under the different heads.
11. For the foregoing reasons, the present appeal is allowed. The appellant-original claimant is held entitled to total amount of compensation to the tune of Rs.3,35,000/- with proportionate costs and interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till its actual realization. The total amount of compensation is, therefore, reconsidered and revised as under:
Under the Head of Compensation of Rs.
Future loss of Income 3,00,000/-
Medical Expenses 10,000/-
Pain, Shock and Suffering 15,000/-
Attendance, Special, Diet and 10,000/-
Transportation Charges
Grand Total 3,35,000/-
Interest @8%
12. As regards the submissions made by learned advocate for the respondent-Insurance Company to clarify with regard to the interest being awarded as compound interest on the total amount of compensation is concerned, noticing the provisions of Section 171 of the Act, 1988, and in absence of any objection being raised by learned advocate for the appellant, from the findings and reasons assigned by Page 8 of 10 Uploaded by SUYASH KUMAR SRIVASTVA(HC01570) on Tue Sep 09 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 10 00:14:18 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/380/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 08/09/2025 undefined the Tribunal on the issue of liability, in absence of any separate reasons assigned to held entitled compound interest instead of simple interest, it can be inferred that the Tribunal intended to award 8% simple interest on the aforesaid amount of compensation. Thus, it is clarified that the original claimant shall be entitled to simple interest at the rate of 8% from the date of filing of the claim petition till its actual realization on the aforesaid enhanced amount of compensation.
13. With these observations, the present First Appeal is hereby allowed to the aforesaid extent. The impugned judgment and award dated 15.06.2021 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi) & 8th Additional District Judge, Limkheda, District- Dahod in M.A.C.P. No.948 of 2017, is hereby modified. The appellant-original claimant is held entitled to total amount of compensation to the tune of Rs. 3,35,000/- with simple interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till its actual realization.
14. The respondents are jointly and severally held liable to pay the aforesaid amount of compensation with proportionate costs and interest within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. On deposit of the aforesaid enhanced amount by the respondents, the Tribunal is directed to release and disburse the aforesaid amount in favour of the original claimant, subject to due Page 9 of 10 Uploaded by SUYASH KUMAR SRIVASTVA(HC01570) on Tue Sep 09 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 10 00:14:18 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/380/2023 JUDGMENT DATED: 08/09/2025 undefined verification, strictly in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in this regard. While making the payment, learned Tribunal shall deduct the Court Fees, if not paid, in accordance with prevailing Rules. Let the aforesaid exercise be undertaken by the Tribunal within a period of two weeks from the date of deposit of the award amount.
15. With these observations, present First Appeal stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.
16. Record and proceedings received , if any, be sent back to the concerned court forthwith.
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J) SUYASH SRIVASTAVA/SFS/08/09 Page 10 of 10 Uploaded by SUYASH KUMAR SRIVASTVA(HC01570) on Tue Sep 09 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Sep 10 00:14:18 IST 2025