Gujarat High Court
Pareshsinh Ajitsinh Chhasatiya vs Hiralben D/O Bipinsinh Vakhatsinh ... on 13 October, 2025
Author: Sangeeta K. Vishen
Bench: Sangeeta K. Vishen
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/1085/2025 ORDER DATED: 13/10/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 1085 of
2025
In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 3356 of 2025
==========================================================
PARESHSINH AJITSINH CHHASATIYA
Versus
HIRALBEN D/O BIPINSINH VAKHATSINH VAGHELA W/O PARESHSINH
AJITSINH CHHASATIYA
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MOHSIN M HAKIM(5396) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
RULE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN
and
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 13/10/2025
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN)
1. By this application, the applicant has prayed for condoning the delay of 24 days caused in preferring the captioned first appeal.
2. Mr.Adnan A Khan, learned Advocate appearing for Mr.Mohsin Hakim, learned Advocate submitted that after the judgment was ready for delivery the applicant took steps. The papers were gathered and information was collected and was provided to the learned Advocate. In the process, there occurred a delay of 24 days. It is urged that the delay is bona fide which may kindly be condoned.
3. The affidavit of direct service is filed indicating that the notice has been served upon the Advocate Mr.I J Haroshi of the respondent as per the order dated 01.09.2025.
Page 1 of 2 Uploaded by SINDHU NAIR(HC01395) on Tue Oct 14 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Oct 15 03:20:26 IST 2025NEUTRAL CITATION C/CA/1085/2025 ORDER DATED: 13/10/2025 undefined
4. Though served, the respondent has chosen not to enter appearance.
5. Having regard to the averments made so also the oral submissions, this Court, is of the opinion that delay of 24 days caused in filing the captioned appeal deserves to be condoned and is hereby condoned.
6. Civil application succeeds and is accordingly allowed. Rule is made absolute. No order as to costs.
(SANGEETA K. VISHEN,J) (NISHA M. THAKORE,J) SINDHU NAIR Page 2 of 2 Uploaded by SINDHU NAIR(HC01395) on Tue Oct 14 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Oct 15 03:20:26 IST 2025