Gujarat High Court
Bhartiben Ranabhai Solanki vs Kuldipsinh Laljibhai Lakum on 6 October, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/3628/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/10/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 3628
of 2025
In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 21008 of 2025
==========================================================
BHARTIBEN RANABHAI SOLANKI
Versus
KULDIPSINH LALJIBHAI LAKUM & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
NISHIT A BHALODI(9597) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR DHAIRYAWAN D BHATT(11817) for the Respondent(s) No. 3,5
NOTICE NOT RECD BACK for the Respondent(s) No. 4
NOTICE UNSERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI
Date : 06/10/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. The present application has been preferred for seeking condonation of delay of 134 days caused in preferring the appeal against the impugned judgment and award.
2. Heard learned advocates for the parties.
3. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the delay of 134 days has occasioned in preferring the appeal owing to the poverty of the applicant as he could not arrange the finance to pay the court fees and other expenses involved in preferring the appeal. He further submitted that the delay is neither intentional nor malafide but has occasioned owing to the Page 1 of 2 Uploaded by MR.CHIRAG DESHRAJ PAL(HCD0072) on Tue Oct 07 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Oct 08 00:48:45 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/CA/3628/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/10/2025 undefined reasons as stated in the application.
4. On the other hand, learned advocate Mr. D. D. Bhatt appearing on behalf of the respondents no.3 and 5 submitted that considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, appropriate order may be passed.
5. Having considered the submissions of the learned advocate for the applicant and having regard to the ground for delay pressed into service, I am of the considered view that the delay has been sufficiently explained and the same deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. No order as to costs. The present application is disposed of.
6. Registry is directed to reflect the name of learned advocate Mr. D. D. Bhatt appearing on behalf of the respondents no.3 and 5 in the First Appeal.
(MOOL CHAND TYAGI, J) CDP Page 2 of 2 Uploaded by MR.CHIRAG DESHRAJ PAL(HCD0072) on Tue Oct 07 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Oct 08 00:48:45 IST 2025