Gujarat High Court
Dabhi Dineshbhai Dahyabhai vs Jitendrabhai @ Munnabhai Ratansang ... on 6 October, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/3432/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/10/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 3432
of 2025
In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 10415 of 2025
==========================================================
DABHI DINESHBHAI DAHYABHAI
Versus
JITENDRABHAI @ MUNNABHAI RATANSANG SINDHA & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR H M SHAH(3997) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
K K MAGHNANI(7543) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
MR K B MAGHNANI(9673) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
MR NIKUNT K RAVAL(5558) for the Respondent(s) No. 4
NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOOL CHAND TYAGI
Date : 06/10/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. The present application has been preferred for seeking condonation of delay of 62 days caused in preferring the appeal against the impugned judgment and award.
2. Heard learned advocates for the parties.
3. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the delay of 62 days has occasioned in preferring the appeal owing to reasons that the applicant could not contact with the lawyer within a period of limitation. He further submitted that the delay is neither intentional nor malafide but has occasioned owing to Page 1 of 2 Uploaded by MR.CHIRAG DESHRAJ PAL(HCD0072) on Tue Oct 07 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Oct 08 00:43:01 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/CA/3432/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/10/2025 undefined the reasons as stated in the application.
4. On the other hand, learned advocate Mr. Nikunt K. Raval appearing on behalf of the respondent no.4 and learned advocate Mr. K. K. Maghnani appearing on behalf of the respondent no.3 submitted that considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, appropriate order may be passed.
5. Having considered the submissions of the learned advocates for the parties and having regard to the ground for delay pressed into service, I am of the considered view that the delay has been sufficiently explained and the same deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. No order as to costs. The present application is disposed of.
6. Registry is directed to reflect the name of learned advocate Mr. Nikunt K. Raval for the respondent no.4 and learned advocate Mr. K. K. Maghnani for the respondent no.3 in the First Appeal.
(MOOL CHAND TYAGI, J) CDP Page 2 of 2 Uploaded by MR.CHIRAG DESHRAJ PAL(HCD0072) on Tue Oct 07 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Oct 08 00:43:01 IST 2025