Gujarat High Court
Lrs. Of Hansrajbhai Zaverbhai vs Spl. Laq Officer on 3 October, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/177/2009 JUDGMENT DATED: 03/10/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 177 of 2009
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 179 of 2009
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 181 of 2009
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 183 of 2009
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 184 of 2009
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 185 of 2009
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 187 of 2009
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 188 of 2009
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 189 of 2009
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 191 of 2009
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 192 of 2009
With
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 193 of 2009
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
================================================================
Approved for Reporting Yes No
================================================================
LRS. OF HANSRAJBHAI ZAVERBHAI & ANR.
Versus
SPL. LAQ OFFICER & ANR.
================================================================
Appearance:
MR YH MOTIRAMANI(3720) for the Appellant(s) No. 1,1.1
MS ROSHNI PATEL, ASST. GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Defendant(s)
No. 1
NILAY H PATEL(7856) for the Defendant(s) No. 2
================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M.
PRACHCHHAK
Date : 03/10/2025
Page 1 of 6
Uploaded by DOLLY CHETAN VADUKAR(HC01392) on Thu Oct 09 2025 Downloaded on : Thu Oct 09 21:52:52 IST 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/177/2009 JUDGMENT DATED: 03/10/2025
undefined
COMMON ORAL JUDGMENT
1. All these appeals involve common questions on law and facts and therefore, they are disposed of by this common judgment treating the First Appeal No. 177 of 2009 as lead matter.
2. Present appeals are fled by the appellants - original claimants under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter be referred to as "the Act") read with Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 challenging the common judgement and award dated 30.09.2006 passed by the learned 4 th Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bhavnagar (hereinafter be referred to as "the Reference Court") in Land Acquisition Reference Nos. 42 of 1998, 29 of 1998, 31 of 1998, 33 of 1998, 34 of 1998, 35 of 1998, 37 of 1998, 38 of 1998, 39 of 1998, 41 of 1998, 43 of 1998 & 44 of 1998 respectively, whereby, the Reference Court has awarded Rs.13/- per square meter, over-and-above the amount awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer.
3. In view of the fact that First Appeal No. 177 of 2009 is treated as lead matter, facts mentioned in the said First Appeal are considered. It is the case of the appellant that for the purpose of irrigation scheme of Narmada Sinchai Yojna, the State Government acquired the lands of the appellant - original claimant situated at Village: Lathidad, Taluka: Botad, District: Bhavnagar. That, notification under Section 4 of the Act was issued on 17.04.1995 and declaration under Section 6 of the Act was published on 23.11.1995 and ultimately, the Special Land Acquisition Officer declared the award on 03.07.1997 and awarded compensation at the rate of Rs.1.40ps. per Page 2 of 6 Uploaded by DOLLY CHETAN VADUKAR(HC01392) on Thu Oct 09 2025 Downloaded on : Thu Oct 09 21:52:52 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/177/2009 JUDGMENT DATED: 03/10/2025 undefined square meter for non-irrigated land and Rs.2.10ps. per square meter for irrigated land in LAQ Case No. 230 of 1995.
4. Being aggrieved, the appellants - original claimants, preferred the aforesaid LAR Cases under Section 18 of the Act for additional amount of compensation. That, the respondents had filed their written statements denying all the allegations made in the References. That, after considering the pleadings of both the sides, the Reference Court had framed the issues and after considering the documentary as well as the oral evidence led before the Court, the judgment and award dated 30.09.2006 came to be passed by the learned 4 th Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bhavnagar as aforesaid. This has aggrieved the appellants, have preferred the present appeals raising various grounds.
5. Heard Mr. Y.H. Motiramani, learned counsel appearing for the appellants, Ms. Roshni Patel, learned Assistant Government Pleader, appearing for respondent No.1 and Mr. Nilay H. Patel, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 - Saurashtra Branch Canal Department, Botad.
6. Learned counsel Mr. Motiramani has submitted that the impugned judgment and award passed by the Reference Court is contrary to law and evidence on record. He has submitted that the Reference Court has failed to appreciate the fact that the land in question was a fruitful land and tremendous loss is caused to the appellants by its acquisition by the State Government. He has submitted that the appellants were earning their livelihood in the land in question and, therefore, the amount arrived at by the Reference Page 3 of 6 Uploaded by DOLLY CHETAN VADUKAR(HC01392) on Thu Oct 09 2025 Downloaded on : Thu Oct 09 21:52:52 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/177/2009 JUDGMENT DATED: 03/10/2025 undefined Court is very meager and small amount. He has submitted that the appellants were harvesting number of crops during one year from the land in question, however, this aspect was not considered by the Reference Court while passing the impugned judgment and award. He has submitted that the Reference Court has not considered various revenue records like Form 7/12 etc. for consideration of the fruitfulness of the land in question and the deposition given by various witnesses in its true and proper perspective while passing the impugned judgment and award and awarded only Rs.13/- per square meter, which is unjust and inadequate. He has submitted that the Reference Court has not considered the market value of the land in question and the similar sale instances in its proper perspective while passing the impugned judgment and award. He has submitted that the Reference Court ought to have awarded at least Rs.50/- per square meter considering the evidence on record. Over and above the grounds agitated in the memo of appeal, learned counsel Mr. Motiramani has urged that in view of the aforesaid facts, the impugned judgment and award be appropriately modified and the appeals be allowed to that extent.
7. Per contra, learned AGP Ms. Roshini Patel and learned counsel Mr. Nilay Patel, appearing for the respective respondents, have strongly objected the present appeals and submitted that the Reference Court, after considering the oral as well as the documentary evidence and after considering the material produced before it, has rightly passed the impugned judgment and award and there is no any illegality or any irregularity committed by the Reference Court while passing the impugned judgment and award. However, they have fairly submitted before this Court that the award Page 4 of 6 Uploaded by DOLLY CHETAN VADUKAR(HC01392) on Thu Oct 09 2025 Downloaded on : Thu Oct 09 21:52:52 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/177/2009 JUDGMENT DATED: 03/10/2025 undefined dated 29.09.2018 passed by the Reference Court in LAR Case Nos.7 of 1999 to 20 of 1999 pertaining to same village Lathidad, Ta. Botad, Dist. Bhavnagar, wherein an amount of Rs.47/- per square meter has been awarded, has been accepted by the respondents and the same is not challenged further and the same has attained finality. It is submitted that therefore, similar amount of compensation, as awarded in aforesaid LAR cases, is required to be awarded in the present case and the learned counsels have urged that appropriate orders may be passed.
8. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties and perused the material placed on record. I have also gone through the impugned judgment and award passed by the Reference Court. On perusal of the award dated 29.09.2018 passed by the Reference Court in LAR Case Nos.7 of 1999 to 20 of 1999 pertaining to same village Lathidad, Ta. Botad, Dist. Bhavnagar, it appears that the lands in the said cases were acquired for the same purpose by issuing notification under Section 4 on 12.06.1995, whereas, in the present case, notification under Section 4 was issued on 17.04.1995, so there was a gap of only 2 months in issuance of both the notifications. Considering all these aspects, this Court is of the opinion that the appeals require consideration and the impugned judgment and award deserves to be modified to the extent that the appellants are entitled to an amount of Rs.47/- per square meter taking into consideration the award dated 29.09.2018 passed in LAR Case Nos.7 of 1999 to 20 of 1999.
9. Resultantly, following final order is passed:-
All the first appeals are hereby allowed. The appellants -
Page 5 of 6 Uploaded by DOLLY CHETAN VADUKAR(HC01392) on Thu Oct 09 2025 Downloaded on : Thu Oct 09 21:52:52 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/177/2009 JUDGMENT DATED: 03/10/2025 undefined
claimants of these appeals shall be entitled to get Rs.30.50ps. per square meter in addition to the amount of Rs.3.50ps. (1.40 + 2.10) per square meter awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and Rs.13/- per square meter awarded by the Reference Court, Bhavnagar, the total amount comes to Rs.47/- per square meter. The respondents shall deposit additional amount of compensation with statutory benefits before the Reference Court within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the order. On deposit of the amount, the same shall be disbursed in favour of each claimant, through RTGS / NEFT and the bank account details shall be furnished by the counsel for the claimants to the Registry of the Reference Court, Bhavnagar. Other observations of the Reference Court for statutory benefits provided under the Act shall remain intact. Decree be drawn accordingly. Record and proceedings be sent back to the concerned Reference Court forthwith.
(HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J) Dolly Page 6 of 6 Uploaded by DOLLY CHETAN VADUKAR(HC01392) on Thu Oct 09 2025 Downloaded on : Thu Oct 09 21:52:52 IST 2025