Gujarat High Court
Lhrs Of Decd. Kiritbhai Ranabhai ... vs Hariram Gopal Lal Meena on 20 November, 2025
Author: Sangeeta K. Vishen
Bench: Sangeeta K. Vishen
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/3971/2025 ORDER DATED: 20/11/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 3971 of
2025
In F/FIRST APPEAL NO. 22923 of 2025
==========================================================
LHRS OF DECD. KIRITBHAI RANABHAI CHAUHAN & ORS.
Versus
HARIRAM GOPAL LAL MEENA & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. JAY M THAKKAR(6677) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR GC MAZMUDAR(1193) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
MR HG MAZMUDAR(1194) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
RULE THROUGH RPAD NOT RECEIVED BACK for the Respondent(s) No.
1,2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN
and
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 20/11/2025
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN)
1. By this application, the applicant has prayed for condoning the delay of 65 days caused in preferring the captioned first appeal.
2. Mr.Deep Hirani, learned Advocate appearing for Mr.Jay M Thakkar, learned advocate for the applicant has made submissions along the lines of the averments made in the application. It is submitted that after the judgment was pronounced the applicant, who is taking care of her family was unable to take prompt steps; however, after putting various efforts information was gathered and instructions were received and were provided to the learned Advocate. As a result whereof, some time got consumed culminating into Page 1 of 2 Uploaded by SINDHU NAIR(HC01395) on Thu Nov 20 2025 Downloaded on : Fri Nov 21 00:02:17 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/CA/3971/2025 ORDER DATED: 20/11/2025 undefined delay of 65 days. It is urged that the delay is bona fide which may kindly be condoned.
3. Having regard to the averments made so also the oral submissions and explanation offered, this Court, is of the opinion that delay is sufficiently explained and hence, delay of 65 days caused in filing the captioned appeal deserves to be condoned and is hereby condoned.
4. Civil application succeeds and is accordingly allowed. Rule is made absolute. No order as to costs.
(SANGEETA K. VISHEN,J) (NISHA M. THAKORE,J) SINDHU NAIR Page 2 of 2 Uploaded by SINDHU NAIR(HC01395) on Thu Nov 20 2025 Downloaded on : Fri Nov 21 00:02:17 IST 2025