Gujarat High Court
Laxmiben Vipulbhai Mundhava vs Shekhabhai Sagrambhai Han on 14 November, 2025
Author: Sangeeta K. Vishen
Bench: Sangeeta K. Vishen
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/5313/2025 ORDER DATED: 14/11/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 5313 of
2025
In F/CROSS OBJECTION NO. 30842 of 2025
==========================================================
LAXMIBEN VIPULBHAI MUNDHAVA & ORS.
Versus
SHEKHABHAI SAGRAMBHAI HAN & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
NISHIT A BHALODI(9597) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5
MR RATHIN P RAVAL(5013) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN
and
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 14/11/2025
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SANGEETA K. VISHEN) The present application has been filed with a prayer to condone the delay of 167 days caused in preferring the Cross Objection in F/First Appeal no.253 of 2025.
2. Mr Nishit A. Bhalodi, learned advocate for the applicant has made submissions along the lines of the averments made in the application. It is submitted that after taking necessary opinion and after understanding the aspects of fees and expenses involved, the cross objection was filed and in the process, there occurred a delay of 167 days. It is urged that First Appeal no.253 of 2024 by the Insurance Company arising out of the self-same judgment, is admitted by this Court. Request is made for passing necessary order.
Page 1 of 2 Uploaded by BINOY B PILLAI(HC00183) on Fri Nov 14 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Nov 15 05:16:08 IST 2025NEUTRAL CITATION C/CA/5313/2025 ORDER DATED: 14/11/2025 undefined
3. Mr Rathin P. Raval, learned advocate for the respondent has no objection if the delay is condoned.
4. Issue rule, returnable forthwith. Mr Rathin P. Raval, learned advocate waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent.
5. Having regard to the averments, so also the submissions made, this Court deems it appropriate to accept the explanation offered and the delay occurred, deserves to be condoned and is accordingly, condoned. Civil Application succeeds and is accordingly allowed. Rule is made absolute. No order as to costs.
(SANGEETA K. VISHEN,J) (NISHA M. THAKORE,J) BINOY B PILLAI Page 2 of 2 Uploaded by BINOY B PILLAI(HC00183) on Fri Nov 14 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Nov 15 05:16:08 IST 2025