Gujarat High Court
Mamtaben Pravinkumar Mahavar D/O ... vs Pravinkumar Girishkumar Mahavar on 7 May, 2025
Author: Biren Vaishnav
Bench: Biren Vaishnav
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/3676/2017 ORDER DATED: 07/05/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 3676 of 2017
==========================================================
MAMTABEN PRAVINKUMAR MAHAVAR D/O KANAIYALAL METIYANI
Versus
PRAVINKUMAR GIRISHKUMAR MAHAVAR
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. BK. RAJ(3794) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MALHAR J PARMAR(10124) for the Defendant(s) No. 1
MR DHRUV B GOSWAMI(10215) for the Defendant(s) No. 1
MR NEEL V SOLANKI(10278) for the Defendant(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA
Date : 07/05/2025
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIREN VAISHNAV)
1. Heard Mr.B.K. Raj, learned counsel for the appellant, Mr.Malhar Parmar, learned counsel and Mr.Neel Solanki, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Challenge in this appeal, at the hands of wife, is to the judgment and decree of the learned Family Court by which, the learned Family Court granted a decree of divorce in favour of the respondent.
3. When the matter is taken up today, both the learned counsels state that the appellant and the respondent are present in the Court and are identified by them. Mr.B.K. Raj, learned counsel for the appellant states that the client, who he identifies and is present in the Court, has been paid an amount of Rs.13 lacs as permanent Page 1 of 2 Uploaded by PANCHAL HITESHKUMAR JAGDISHBHAI(HC00195) on Fri May 09 2025 Downloaded on : Sat May 10 16:01:47 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/3676/2017 ORDER DATED: 07/05/2025 undefined alimony as full and final settlement. In light of this, he has instructions to withdraw the appeal.
4. Mr.Malhar Parmar, learned counsel and Mr.Neel Solanki, learned counsel confirms that the amount of Rs.13 lacs has been paid by way of a cheque to the appellant and the cheque has already been honoured. This statement has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the appellant.
5. In light of this settlement arrived at between the parties and on instructions to the appellant's advocate to withdraw the appeal, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn in presence of the parties.
(BIREN VAISHNAV, J) (L. S. PIRZADA, J) Hitesh Page 2 of 2 Uploaded by PANCHAL HITESHKUMAR JAGDISHBHAI(HC00195) on Fri May 09 2025 Downloaded on : Sat May 10 16:01:47 IST 2025