Mohammedjuber Basir Shaikh vs State Of Gujarat

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 840 Guj
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Mohammedjuber Basir Shaikh vs State Of Gujarat on 11 July, 2025

                                                                                                                 NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.RA/997/2025                                      ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025

                                                                                                                  undefined




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST CONVICTION -
                                  NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT) NO. 997 of 2025
                                                      With
                            CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (REGULAR BAIL) NO. 1 of 2024
                               In R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 997 of 2025
                      ==========================================================
                                               MOHAMMEDJUBER BASIR SHAIKH
                                                          Versus
                                                 STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      ADILHUSHAIN M SAIYED(9723) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MR HK PATEL APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      ==========================================================

                       CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA

                                                          Date : 11/07/2025

                                                            ORAL ORDER

1. Rule. Learned A.P.P. Mr.H.K. Patel waives service of Rule for the respondent - State.

2. Learned advocate Mr.Kiran Udasi states that he has instructions to appear for the respondent no.2 - original complainant and seeks permission to file vakalatnama.

3. Permission is accordingly granted. Registry to accept the vakalatnama that may be filed by learned advocate Mr.Udasi.

Page 1 of 3 Uploaded by PANCHAL HITESHKUMAR JAGDISHBHAI(HC00195) on Tue Jul 15 2025 Downloaded on : Tue Jul 15 22:03:31 IST 2025

NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.RA/997/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025 undefined

4. Learned advocate Mr.Udasi submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the respondent no.2 - original complainant is also present virtually before the Court and upon asking by the Court, he stated that the cheque amount is already been received by the original complainant and he has no objection, if the present applicant is acquitted from all the charges. Further, he has also filed his affidavit confirming the said fact.

5. Considering the fact that the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is a compoundable offence and the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, the following order is passed:-

(1) The order dated 07.01.2022 passed by the learned 5th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bharuch in Criminal Case No.1395 of 2018, convicting the applicant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentencing to undergo 1 year's simple imprisonment and judgment dated 01.09.2023 passed by the learned Page 2 of 3 Uploaded by PANCHAL HITESHKUMAR JAGDISHBHAI(HC00195) on Tue Jul 15 2025 Downloaded on : Tue Jul 15 22:03:31 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.RA/997/2025 ORDER DATED: 11/07/2025 undefined Sessions Judge, Bharuch in Criminal Appeal no.45 of 2023, dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment of conviction passed by the learned trial Court is hereby quashed and set aside and the present applicant is ordered to be acquitted from all the charges and since the present applicant is in judicial custody, he shall be released immediately by the concerned jail authority, if he is not required in any other offence.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Damodar S.Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal H. reported in AIR 2010 SC (1907), the applicant has to deposit 5% of the cheque amount before the Gujarat State Legal Service Authority within 2 weeks.

7. The present application is disposed of accordingly. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

(L. S. PIRZADA, J) Hitesh Page 3 of 3 Uploaded by PANCHAL HITESHKUMAR JAGDISHBHAI(HC00195) on Tue Jul 15 2025 Downloaded on : Tue Jul 15 22:03:31 IST 2025