State Of Gujarat vs Rabari Lilabhai Ramabhai Deceased

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 818 Guj
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2025

Gujarat High Court

State Of Gujarat vs Rabari Lilabhai Ramabhai Deceased on 11 July, 2025

                                                                                                               NEUTRAL CITATION




                             C/FA/341/2012                                   JUDGMENT DATED: 11/07/2025

                                                                                                                undefined




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                                                 R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 341 of 2012


                       FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:


                       HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK Sd/-
                       ==========================================================

                                    Approved for Reporting                   Yes           No
                       ==========================================================
                                                STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                                                         Versus
                                       RABARI LILABHAI RAMABHAI DECEASED & ORS.
                       ==========================================================
                       Appearance:
                       MS ROSHNI PATEL AGP for the Appellant(s) No. 1,2
                       RULE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No.
                       1.1,1.2,2,3.1,3.2,3.3,3.4,3.5,3.6,3.7,3.8,4.1,4.2,4.3,4.4,4.5,4.6
                       ==========================================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK

                                                         Date : 11/07/2025


                                                         ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Present appeal is filed by the appellant-State under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 r/w Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging the judgment and award dated 23.10.2008 passed by the Presiding Officer, F.T.C. No.1, Mehsana (hereinafter referred to as the " Reference Court") in Land Reference Page 1 of 6 Uploaded by SURESH SOLANKI(HC00208) on Tue Jul 15 2025 Downloaded on : Tue Jul 15 22:02:09 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/341/2012 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/07/2025 undefined Case Nos.1 to 16 of 2005 whereby the Reference Court partly allowed the Reference Case Nos. 1 to 16 of 2005 and awarded amount of Rs.82.00 per Sq. Mtr. over and above the amount of compensation awarded by Special Land Acquisition Officer.

2. The facts in brief are that the competent authority under the Land Acquisition Act had acquired land situated at Village Kherva, Taluka and District Mehsana, belonging to the respondents-original claimants for the purpose of extension of Jalashay. The notification under Section 4 has been published by the competent authority under the Act on 4.7.2002 and after following due procedure, notification under Section 6 was published on 24.10.2002 and thereafter, the lands came to be acquired. Award came to be passed by the Land Acquisition Officer in L.A.Q. Case No.13 of 2002, whereby the Land Acquisition Officer has awarded Rs.18.10/- per sq. mtr. for the irrigated land.

3. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the said Page 2 of 6 Uploaded by SURESH SOLANKI(HC00208) on Tue Jul 15 2025 Downloaded on : Tue Jul 15 22:02:09 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/341/2012 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/07/2025 undefined award, the original claimants preferred Land Reference Case Nos. 1 to 16 of 2005 before the Reference Court.

4. The Reference Court after hearing both the parties and after evaluating the evidence placed on record has passed the impugned judgment and award, awarded Rs.82/- per sq. mtr. over and above the compensation already awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and award, the State has preferred present appeal.

5. Heard Ms. Patel, learned AGP for the appellant. Though served, no one is appearing on behalf of the respondents.

6. Learned AGP for the appellant has submitted that the Reference Court has committed an error in passing the impugned judgment and award. She has submitted that the Reference Court has without assigning any reason has increased the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. She has also submitted that the claimants have not produced any evidence to prove or Page 3 of 6 Uploaded by SURESH SOLANKI(HC00208) on Tue Jul 15 2025 Downloaded on : Tue Jul 15 22:02:09 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/341/2012 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/07/2025 undefined show that they are entitled to more compensation. She has submitted that the Reference Court has failed to appreciate the documentary evidence produced by the appellant and therefore, she urges before the Court that present appeal may be allowed and the impugned judgment and award passed by the Reference Court may be quashed and set aside.

7. It appears that in identical group of appeals arising from the same village i.e. Kherva, the Division Bench of this Court vide judgment and award dated 9.9.2010 passed in First Appeal No. 441 of 2010 and allied matters, has already decided the similar issue. In the said appeals the lands were acquired for the purpose of "Sujlam Suflam" Spreading Canal, whereas in present case, the lands were acquired for the purpose of extension of Jalashay.

8. The Division Bench of this Court, after hearing both the sides and after evaluating the evidence placed on record has confirmed the order passed by the Reference Page 4 of 6 Uploaded by SURESH SOLANKI(HC00208) on Tue Jul 15 2025 Downloaded on : Tue Jul 15 22:02:09 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/341/2012 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/07/2025 undefined Court.

9. Present appeal is squarely covered by the said judgment and award dated 9.10.2010 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in First Appeal No. 441 of 2010 and allied matters.

10. In view of the above, learned AGP is unable to canvas her contention, as the present appeal is already covered by the said judgment and award.

11. In view of the above and in view of the decision of this Court in case of State of Gujarat vs. Amaji Mohanji Thakor reported in 2010 GLH 3 447, present appeal does not deserves to be entertained and the same is required to be dismissed. Accordingly, present appeal is hereby dismissed in view of the above referred judgment.

12. The amount deposited by the appellant- State shall be disbursed in favour of respondents- claimants after following due procedure through R.T.G.S. / N.E.F.T. within period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of Page 5 of 6 Uploaded by SURESH SOLANKI(HC00208) on Tue Jul 15 2025 Downloaded on : Tue Jul 15 22:02:09 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/341/2012 JUDGMENT DATED: 11/07/2025 undefined copy of this order. Interim relief, if any stands vacated forthwith. Record and proceedings if received, be sent back to the concerned Reference Court forthwith.

Sd/-

(HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J) SURESH SOLANKI Page 6 of 6 Uploaded by SURESH SOLANKI(HC00208) on Tue Jul 15 2025 Downloaded on : Tue Jul 15 22:02:09 IST 2025