Hiteshbhai Kanjibhai Vaghasiya vs State Of Gujarat

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 475 Guj
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2025

Gujarat High Court

Hiteshbhai Kanjibhai Vaghasiya vs State Of Gujarat on 1 July, 2025

                                                                                                               NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/SCR.A/6154/2025                                   ORDER DATED: 01/07/2025

                                                                                                                undefined




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                         R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (QUASHING) NO. 6154 of 2025
                      ==========================================================
                                                HITESHBHAI KANJIBHAI VAGHASIYA
                                                             Versus
                                                    STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
                      ==========================================================
                      Appearance:
                      MR SATYAJIT S SONAGARA(12218) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                      MS SHRUTI PATHAK, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                      MR VISHWAJIT VAGHELA, ADVOCATE for the Complainant
                      ==========================================================
                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                                                            Date : 01/07/2025

                                                 ORAL ORDER

[1] Rule. Learned advocates waives service of rule for the respective respondents.

[2] By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 528 of the BNSS, the petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 29.11.2024 passed by 3rd learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surat, in Criminal Case No.17756/2020, by which the petitioner has been convicted and ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay the remaining amount of Rs.6,65,400/- towards compensation to the complainant within sixty days and in default of payment of the said amount, the petitioner to undergo further simple imprisonment for a period of six months and as the petitioner was not present when the judgment was pronounced, the learned Magistrate issued Non-bailable warrant under Section 70 of the Cr.P.C. against the petitioner.

[3] It appears that the settlement has been arrived at between the complainant and present petitioner and the entire cheque amount has been paid to the respondent complainant, which has been confirmed by the complainant by detailed affidavit, which is produced on record separately, the same is taken on record. The complainant do not wish to proceed further and is willing to compound the offence. Accordingly, the petitioner Page 1 of 2 Uploaded by SUCHITKUMAR PATEL(HC01083) on Wed Jul 02 2025 Downloaded on : Thu Jul 03 02:33:04 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION R/SCR.A/6154/2025 ORDER DATED: 01/07/2025 undefined by filing this petition, seeks compounding of the offence under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

[4] The petitioner also submits that the petitioner is willing to deposit costs as directed by the Supreme Court in case of Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H., reported in (2010) 5 SCC 633, with the Legal Service Authority.

[5] In case of Kripalsingh Pratapsingh Vs. Salvinder Kaur Hardisingh Lohana reported in (2004)2 GLH 544, the Coordinate Bench of this Court after considering various decisions of the Apex Court, took a view that it would be permissible for the High Court in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 528 of the BNSS, to record the settlement arrived at between the parties and acquit the accused of the charges.

[6] Thus, taking into account the fact of settlement, the compounding of the offence is hereby permitted. Although the petitioner has filed the present petition directly before this Court, since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement and the offence is compoundable even at the admission stage under Section 147 of the Act, the petition deserves consideration.

[7] As a result, the petition is allowed. The order order dated 29.11.2024 passed by 3rd learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surat, in Criminal Case No.17756/2020 and warrant issued by it are hereby quashed and set aside. The petitioner is acquitted of the offences under the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner is directed to deposit 15% of the cheque amount i.e. Rs.73,565/- (total cheque amount of Rs.4,90,438/-) with the Gujarat State Legal Services Authority within a period of one week from the date of receipt of this order. Rule is made absolute to aforesaid extent. Direct service permitted.

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J) SUCHIT Page 2 of 2 Uploaded by SUCHITKUMAR PATEL(HC01083) on Wed Jul 02 2025 Downloaded on : Thu Jul 03 02:33:04 IST 2025