Gujarat High Court
Gajraj Kalidas Solanki(Minor) Through ... vs Sardarbhai Joraji Vanzara on 13 February, 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/FA/634/2012 ORDER DATED: 13/02/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 634 of 2012
==========================================================
GAJRAJ KALIDAS SOLANKI(MINOR) THROUGH SAVITABEN KALIDAS SOLA
& ORS.
Versus
SARDARBHAI JORAJI VANZARA & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SUREN M SHAH(1118) for the Appellant(s) No. 1,2,3,4
MR VIBHUTI NANAVATI(513) for the Defendant(s) No. 3
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI
Date : 13/02/2025
ORAL ORDER
1. The present First Appeal, under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, is preferred by the appellants - original claimants being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and award dated 30.09.2008 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmeabad in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.2161 of 1996.
2. Brief facts of the case are as under :
2.1 The brief fact of the present appeal is such that on 17.06.1996, one Vinodbhai Sonara was riding in triple on motorcycle No.GBN-4462 from Mihijada to Saroda and deceased Kalidas Kuberdas Solanki and one Kuberbhai Solanki was travelling as pillion riders and when they reached near the place of accident, one Truck bearing No.GJ-1-V-6768 came from wrong side in rash and negligent manner and dashed with the motorcycle and upon occurrence of the accident, deceased sustained fatal injuries and later on died.Page 1 of 6 Uploaded by GAURAV J THAKER(HC00951) on Fri Feb 14 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Feb 15 02:59:01 IST 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/634/2012 ORDER DATED: 13/02/2025 undefined
3. Learned advocate for the appellants - claimants has submitted that the Tribunal has committed an error in not properly calculating the amount of compensation. He has submitted that amount of award is on lower side as the Tribunal has not properly considered the various aspects; like prospective income of the deceased, negligence, liability and family circumstances, etc. 3.1 He has submitted that the compensation is required to be enhanced by modifying the award impugned accordingly and this appeal may be allowed.
4. Per contra, learned advocate for respondent - Insurance Company has submitted that the impugned judgment and award passed by the Tribunal is just and proper. The Tribunal has rightly considered the income of the deceased, the age of the deceased, the dependency and future aspect of income. He has submitted that under the head of loss of estate and funeral expenses, the Tribunal has rightly awarded compensation. He has submitted that the amount under the head of loss of consortium is just and proper. He has submitted that this appeal may be dismissed and no interference be made by this Court.
5. Apt to note that the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 is a beneficial piece of Legislation. The concept of just and fair compensation is integral and seminal to the MV Act. The compensation to be awarded under the principle of just and fair compensation to the injured of the road accident or the legal representative/s of the deceased person is based on the principle of fairness, Page 2 of 6 Uploaded by GAURAV J THAKER(HC00951) on Fri Feb 14 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Feb 15 02:59:01 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/634/2012 ORDER DATED: 13/02/2025 undefined reasonableness and equability. Anguish of the heart or for mental turbulence being consequential result of the road accident cannot be actually compensated, but the quint essentiality lies in adopting holistic and pragmatic view to the computation of the compensation for the loss sustained, which is to be in the realm of realistic approximation. Although exact or perfect arithmetical calculation of compensation for reparation of the loss arrived from the road accident is almost impossible. The Tribunal is bestowed with duty to make an endevour to award just compensation regardless of the amount claimed by the claimants. The determination of the quantum of compensation therefore, must be liberal and not niggardly since the law values life and limb in a free country in generous scale. Needless to state that money may be awarded, so that something tangible may be procured to reach something else of the like nature, which has been destroyed or lost, but money cannot renew physical frame that has been battered and shattered being a result of the road accident. Yet Tribunal to endavour to bring back victim to stage of pre-road accident as far as possible Thus, the award must be reasonable and cannot be assessed with moderation though it cannot at the same time be pity and what could be granted must be just, fair and equitable compensation.
6.1 I have considered the submissions made by the rival parties. I have perused the record and proceedings of the Tribunal. I have gone through the impugned judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal whereby learned Tribunal granted total compensation of Rs.7,70,000/- to the claimants.
Page 3 of 6 Uploaded by GAURAV J THAKER(HC00951) on Fri Feb 14 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Feb 15 02:59:01 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/634/2012 ORDER DATED: 13/02/2025 undefined
The facts noticed from the pleadings are that on 17.06.1996, one Vinodbhai Sonara was riding motorcycle No.GBN-4462 in triple from Mihijada to Saroda and deceased Kalidas Kuberdas Solanki and one Kuberbhai Solanki was travelling as pillion riders and when they reached near the place of accident, one Truck bearing No.GJ-1-V-6768 came from wrong side in rash and negligent manner and dashed with the motorcycle and upon occurrence of the accident, deceased Kalidas sustained fatal injuries and later on died. From the record, it transpires that the learned Tribunal has erred in not adding the future prospects. Hence, considering the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Shethi reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680, 40% rise is given for loss of future prospects as deceased was not having permanetn source of income. The deceased was aged 30 years at the time of accident, hence as per the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Pranay Sethi (supra), multiplier of 17 would be applied. Further, considering the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Pranay Sethi (supra), the general and non-pecuniary damages, Rs.18,150/- each towards loss of estate and funeral expenses should be awarded. Towards loss of consortium, there are four dependents and therefore, Rs.48,400/- to each dependent should be awarded as per the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Magma General Insurance Company Limited vs. Nanu Ram alias Chuhru Ram - 2018 (18) SCC 130. The interest rate granted by the learned Tribunal is maintained. Learned Tribunal in case on had assessed 20% negligence of the motorcyclist and 80% negligence of truck driver. However, considering the fact that Page 4 of 6 Uploaded by GAURAV J THAKER(HC00951) on Fri Feb 14 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Feb 15 02:59:01 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/634/2012 ORDER DATED: 13/02/2025 undefined deceased was pillion rider, it is a case of composite negligence and both wrong doers or any of them are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation to the claimants. Finding of learned Tribunal is in consonance with judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Pawan Kumar & Anr. v. Harkishan Dass Mohan Lal & Ors. -2014 (3) SCC 590, which is reiterated in Khenyei vs. New India Assurance Company Limited - 2015 (9) SCC 273. Thus, the said finding is approved.
6.2 Therefore, total compensation would be as under, which the claimants/s is/are entitled to get.
Particulars Amount (Rs.)
Future dependency Loss 12,85,200/-
Rs.6,000/- + Rs.2400/- (40% rise)
=Rs.8400/- minus 1/4 personal exp.
=Rs.6300/- x 12 months x 17 multiplier
Loss of Estate 18,150/-
Funeral Expenses 18,150/-
Consortium (Rs.48,400/- x 4 dependents) 1,93,600/-
Total 15,15,100/-
Less: amount which is already awarded 7,70,000/-
Additional amount which is awarded 7,45,100/-
7. Therefore, I hold that the claimants are entitled to get the enhanced compensation of Rs.7,45,100/- with 9% p.a. interest from the date of filing the claim petition till its realization, jointly and severally from the opponents, which would meet the ends of justice. Rest of the direction(s) of the Tribunal remain same.
Page 5 of 6 Uploaded by GAURAV J THAKER(HC00951) on Fri Feb 14 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Feb 15 02:59:01 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/634/2012 ORDER DATED: 13/02/2025 undefined
8. For the reasons recorded above, the following order is passed.
8.1 The present appeal is partly allowed.
8.2 The Insurance Company is directed to deposit the enhanced amount with interest as stated herein above within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
8.3 The Tribunal shall disburse the entire awarded amount lying in the FDR and/or with the Tribunal, with accrued interest thereon, if any, to the claimants, after making apportionment, if required, by account payee cheque / NEFT / RTGS, after proper verification and after following due procedure.
8.4 While making the payment, the Tribunal shall deduct the courts fees, if not paid, in accordance with rules/law.
8.5 Record and proceedings be sent back to the concerned Tribunal, forthwith.
(J. C. DOSHI, J) GAURAV J THAKER Page 6 of 6 Uploaded by GAURAV J THAKER(HC00951) on Fri Feb 14 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Feb 15 02:59:01 IST 2025