Gujarat High Court
State Of Gujarat, Through Secretary, ... vs Jivan Jyoti Sah Adhyapan Mandir Run By ... on 26 August, 2025
Author: Sunita Agarwal
Bench: Sunita Agarwal
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/4370/2025 ORDER DATED: 26/08/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 4370 of
2025
In F/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 25392 of 2025
With
F/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 25392 of 2025
In
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7728 of 2025
With
CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2025 In F/LETTERS PATENT
APPEAL NO. 25392 of 2025
In
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7728 of 2025
==========================================================
STATE OF GUJARAT, THROUGH SECRETARY, EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT & ANR.
Versus
JIVAN JYOTI SAH ADHYAPAN MANDIR RUN BY JIVAN JYOT EDUCATION
TRUST
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS MAITHILI MEHTA, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the
Applicant(s) No. 1,2
MR SIDDHARTH DAVE, ADVOCATE FOR MS KOMAL S DAVE(8152) for
the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS.
JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.N.RAY
Date : 26/08/2025
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL)
1. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 17.06.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge with certain directions contained therein. Page 1 of 2 Uploaded by A. B. VAGHELA(HC01079) on Fri Aug 29 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Aug 30 00:08:39 IST 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION C/CA/4370/2025 ORDER DATED: 26/08/2025 undefined
2. When the matter was taken up today, at the outset, Ms. Maithili Mehta, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the State appellants would submit that she has been instructed by the Deputy Director, Primary Education, Gandhinagar to withdraw the present appeal. The copy of the instructions received in the Office of the Government Pleader vide letter dated 25.08.2025 are supplied in the Court, which is taken on record.
3. In view of the above statement, the delay condonation application as well as the appeal are dismissed, as withdrawn.
Consequently, the connected Civil Application for Stay would not survive and the same is disposed of, accordingly.
(SUNITA AGARWAL, CJ ) (D.N.RAY,J) A. B. VAGHELA Page 2 of 2 Uploaded by A. B. VAGHELA(HC01079) on Fri Aug 29 2025 Downloaded on : Sat Aug 30 00:08:39 IST 2025