Gauhati High Court
Smti Anjana Chakravarthy vs Sri Subrata Das on 22 May, 2026
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010037702020
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RFA/35/2026
SMTI ANJANA CHAKRAVARTHY
W/O- ADHIR KUMAR CHAKRAVARTHY, R/O- QTR. NO. 205, LGBI AIRPORT
COLONY, P.O. LGBI AIRPORT, P.S. AZARA, KAMRUP(M), GUWAHATI-15,
ASSAM.
VERSUS
SRI SUBRATA DAS
S/O- LATE RADHIKA RANJAN DAS, R/O- QTR NO. 108, GPRA, CPWD,
KATAHBARI, PS. GORCHUK, GUWAHATI-35, KAMRUP(M), ASSAM.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K DAS, MR. M J GOGOI,MR. S SAHU
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R K BHUYAN, MS. A MEDHI,MS. D SONOWAL,MR. M
KASHYAP
WITH
Case : I.A.(Civil)/1546/2026
SMTI ANJANA CHAKRAVARTHY
W/O- ADHIR KUMAR CHAKRAVARTHY
R/O- QTR. NO. 205
LGBI AIRPORT COLONY
P.O. LGBI AIRPORT
P.S. AZARA
Page No.# 2/3
KAMRUP(M)
GUWAHATI-15
ASSAM
VERSUS
SRI SUBRATA DAS
- S/O- LATE RADHIKA RANJAN DAS
R/O- QTR NO. 108
GPRA
CPWD
KATAHBARI
PS. GORCHUK
GUWAHATI-35
KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM.
------------
Advocate for : MR. A K DAS
Advocate for : MR. R K BHUYAN appearing for SRI SUBRATA DAS
In
RFA Case No. 35/2026
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
ORDER
22.05.2026 [1] Heard Ms. L. Thakur, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. S. Sahu, the learned counsel for the appellant, who seeks an accommodation for 2(two) weeks on the ground that a new set of counsel would be appearing for the appellant in this case. [2] On the other hand, Mr. S.A. Singh, the learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the instant appeal has been filed after a delay of 624 Page No.# 3/3 days which was condoned by a co-ordinate bench of this court in the connected I.A.(C) No. 508/2020. He submits that while condoning the delay, by its order dated 16.11.2022; this court had imposed a cost of Rs. 7,000/- upon the present appellant.
[3] However, the said cost has not yet been deposited by the appellant. He submits that this appeal should not be admitted, unless the appellant pays the cost as was directed by this court.
[4] 2(two) week's time is granted to the appellant to comply with the order dated 16.11.2022.
[5] List accordingly.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant