Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010092742020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : RSA/135/2021
SMTI NALINI SAIKIA
W/O LATE PRAMOD CHANDRA SAIKIA, R/O DA GAON, P.O. AND P.S.
DHEKIAJULI, MOUZA NAHARBARI, DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM.
VERSUS
SRI CHANDAN DEV AND 4 ORS
S/O LATE NIRMAL CH. DEV, R/O ERASUTI JANGAL GAON, P.O. AND P.S.
DHEKIAJULI, MOUZA BORGAON, DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM.
2:BANDAN DEV
S/O LATE NIRMAL CH. DEV
R/O ERASUTI JANGAL GAON
P.O. AND P.S. DHEKIAJULI
MOUZA BORGAON
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM.
3:NANDAN DEV
S/O LATE NIRMAL CH. DEV
R/O ERASUTI JANGAL GAON
P.O. AND P.S. DHEKIAJULI
MOUZA BORGAON
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM.
4:SANJU DEV
S/O LATE NIRMAL CH. DEV
R/O ERASUTI JANGAL GAON
P.O. AND P.S. DHEKIAJULI
MOUZA BORGAON
DIST. SONITPUR
Page No.# 2/4
ASSAM.
5:RAVI DEV
S/O LATE NIRMAL CH. DEV
R/O ERASUTI JANGAL GAON
P.O. AND P.S. DHEKIAJULI
MOUZA BORGAON
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D MOZUMDER
Advocate for the Respondent :
Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/2174/2021
SMTI NALINI SAIKIA
W/O LATE PRAMOD CHANDRA SAIKIA
R/O DA GAON
P.O. AND P.S. DHEKIAJULI
MOUZA NAHARBARI
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM.
VERSUS
SRI CHANDAN DEV AND 4 ORS
S/O LATE NIRMAL CH. DEV
R/O ERASUTI JANGAL GAON
P.O. AND P.S. DHEKIAJULI
MOUZA BORGAON
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM.
2:BANDAN DEV
S/O LATE NIRMAL CH. DEV
R/O ERASUTI JANGAL GAON
P.O. AND P.S. DHEKIAJULI
MOUZA BORGAON
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM.
3:NANDAN DEV
Page No.# 3/4
S/O LATE NIRMAL CH. DEV
R/O ERASUTI JANGAL GAON
P.O. AND P.S. DHEKIAJULI
MOUZA BORGAON
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM.
4:SANJU DEV
S/O LATE NIRMAL CH. DEV
R/O ERASUTI JANGAL GAON
P.O. AND P.S. DHEKIAJULI
MOUZA BORGAON
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM.
5:RAVI DEV
S/O LATE NIRMAL CH. DEV
R/O ERASUTI JANGAL GAON
P.O. AND P.S. DHEKIAJULI
MOUZA BORGAON
DIST. SONITPUR
ASSAM.
------------
Advocate for : MR. D MOZUMDER
Advocate for : appearing for SRI CHANDAN DEV AND 4 ORS
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
Date : 23.12.2021 Heard Mr. S. Biswas, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants.
The instant appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law:
1. Whether the Court below were justified in rejecting the certified copy of the deed of sale bearing deed no. 522/1955 without taking into consideration under Section 90 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872 ?
2. Whether the registered certified copies of registered sale deed no. 3382/1968 and registered sale deed no. 105/1971 marked as Exhibit KHA Page No.# 4/4 & GA respectively by the Court and admitted to evidence can be questioned at a later stage on the ground of non-compliance to Section 65 & 66 of the Evidence Act ?
3. Whether the judgment and decree passed by both the Courts without taking into consideration the evidence of DW 6 render the impugned judgment and decree perverse ?
LCR called for.
Steps upon the respondents by ways of registered post as well as by usual process within a period of 10 days.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant