Ram Chander & Ors. vs State Nct Of Delhi And Anr.

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 570 Del
Judgement Date : 23 January, 2024

Delhi High Court

Ram Chander & Ors. vs State Nct Of Delhi And Anr. on 23 January, 2024

Author: Anoop Kumar Mendiratta

Bench: Anoop Kumar Mendiratta

                          $~55
                          *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          %                          Date of Decision: 23.01.2024
                          +     W.P.(CRL) 228/2024
                                RAM CHANDER & ORS.                                   ..... Petitioners
                                            Through:              Mr. Rishabh Gulati and Ms. Savita
                                                                  Yadav, Advs. with petitioners in
                                                                  person.

                                                   versus

                                STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.              ..... Respondents
                                              Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC with
                                                       Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Adv.
                                                       PSI Pradeep Kumar, PS Aman Vihar.
                                                       Ms. Aditi Srivastava, Adv. for R-2
                                                       with respondent no. 2 in person.

                                CORAM:
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
                          %                        JUDGMENT

                          ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)
CRL.M.A. 2087/2024

Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 228/2024

1. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('Cr.P.C.') has been preferred on behalf of the petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 306/2023 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S.: Aman Vihar, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed

W.P.(CRL.) 228/2024 Page 1 of 3 W By:DINESH CHANDRA Signing Date:25.01.2024 15:09:30

2. Issue notice. Learned APP for the State appears on advance notice and accepts notice. Ms. Aditi Srivastava, Advocate appears on behalf of respondent no. 2 alongwith respondent no. 2 who is accompanied with her brother.

3. In brief, as per the case of the petitioners, the marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 was solemnized according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 24.06.2007. Out of the wedlock, a baby girl was born on 01.10.2014, who is in custody of respondent no.2.

4. Proceedings under D.V. Act, 125 Cr.P.C. were filed on behalf of respondent no. 2 and also present FIR was registered on 21.06.2023.

5. The matter is stated to have been amicably resolved between the parties in terms of Memorandum of Settlement dated 14.09.2023. The marriage between the parties has also been dissolved by mutual consent under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, vide decree dated 15.12.2023.

Balance amount of Rs.1,00,000/- (One Lakh Only) has been paid to respondent No.2 today through DD No. 343652 dated December 16, 2023 drawn on Canara Bank, Nangloi-II Branch, New Delhi in favour of respondent No.2 towards full and final settlement between the parties.

6. Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement arrived between the parties, the State has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

7. Petitioners as well as respondent No.2 are present in-person in the Court today and have been identified by PSI Pradeep Kumar, PS Aman Vihar. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed

W.P.(CRL.) 228/2024 Page 2 of 3 W By:DINESH CHANDRA Signing Date:25.01.2024 15:09:30 Respondent No.2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

8. Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. Consequently, FIR No. 306/2023 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S.: Aman Vihar, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed.

Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.

                          JANUARY 23, 2024/akc




Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
                          W.P.(CRL.) 228/2024                                                Page 3 of 3   W
By:DINESH CHANDRA
Signing Date:25.01.2024
15:09:30