Amnish Kumar vs State & Anr.

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 1379 Del
Judgement Date : 28 February, 2020

Delhi High Court
Amnish Kumar vs State & Anr. on 28 February, 2020
$~35
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                                  Date of decision: 28.02.2020

+      CRL.M.C. 1131/2020
       AMNISH KUMAR                                        ..... Petitioner
                          Through       Mr.Ravi Mehta and Mr.Santosh
                                        Kumar, Advs. with petitioner in
                                        person
                          versus

       STATE & ANR.                                       .... Respondents
                          Through       Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State
                                        with ASI Narender Singh, New Delhi
                                        Zone, PCR
                                        Mr.Vikas Tomar, Adv. for R-2 with
                                        R-2 in person.

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

                          J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

CRL. M.A. 4433/2020 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C.1131/2020 & CRL.M.A.4432/2020

3. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No. 296/2016 dated 17.12.2016, registered at PS Connaught Place, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C.1131/2020 Page 1 of 3

4. Notice issued.

5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent No. 2 present in Court and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent No. 2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

7. Respondent No. 2 is personally present in Court with learned counsel and she has been identified by ASI Narender Singh (IO) and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

8. Petitioner and respondent no.2 have amicably entered into an oral settlement on 20.02.2020 and have settled all their disputes.

9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioner any further.

10. For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No. 296/2016 dated 17.12.2016, registered at PS Connaught Place, Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. CRL.M.C.1131/2020 Page 2 of 3

11. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.

12. Pending application stands disposed of.

13. Order dasti.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE FEBRUARY 28, 2020/rk CRL.M.C.1131/2020 Page 3 of 3