Parkash @ Chander Prakash vs State & Anr.

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 1294 Del
Judgement Date : 26 February, 2020

Delhi High Court
Parkash @ Chander Prakash vs State & Anr. on 26 February, 2020
$~45
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                                  Date of decision: 26.02.2020

+      CRL.M.C. 1064/2020
       PARKASH @ CHANDER PRAKASH                           ..... Petitioner
                          Through       Mr.Sunil Tiwari, Adv.

                          versus

       STATE & ANR.                                        .... Respondents
                          Through       Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State
                                        with SI Manoj Kumar, PS Patel
                                        Nagar, Delhi
                                        Mr.Amit Kumar Sharma, Adv. for
                                        R-2 with R-2 in person
       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

                          J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

CRL. M.A. 4236/2020 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.A.4237/2020 (for condonation of delay)

3. In view of reasons stated in present application, delay of 43 days in re-filing petition is condoned.

4. Application is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of. CRL.M.C.1064/2020 Page 1 of 3 CRL.M.C.1064/2020

5. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No. 147/2016 dated 9.2.2016, registered at PS Patel Nagar, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.

6. Notice issued.

7. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent No. 2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

8. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent No. 2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

9. Respondent No. 2 is personally present in Court with her learned counsel and she has been identified by SI Manoj Kumar (IO) and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

10. Petitioner and respondent No. 2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide Settlement Deed dated 6.1.2020.

11. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioner any CRL.M.C.1064/2020 Page 2 of 3 further.

12. For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No. 147/2016 dated 9.2.2016, registered at PS Patel Nagar, Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

13. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.

14. Order dasti.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE FEBRUARY 26, 2020/rk CRL.M.C.1064/2020 Page 3 of 3