Manoj Kumar @ Monu & Ors vs The State & Anr

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 6105 Del
Judgement Date : 28 November, 2019

Delhi High Court
Manoj Kumar @ Monu & Ors vs The State & Anr on 28 November, 2019
$~48
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                                  Date of decision: 28.11.2019

+      CRL.M.C. 6071/2019 & CRL.M.A. 41334/2019 (delay)
       MANOJ KUMAR @ MONU & ORS                            ..... Petitioners
                          Through       Mr. Amarjeet Singh, Adv. with
                                        petitioners in person
                          versus

       THE STATE & ANR                                    ..... Respondents
                     Through            Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State
                                        ASI Jamil, PS Khyala
                                        Complainant /R-2 in person

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

                          J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

CRL. M.A. 41333/2019

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 6071/2019

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 380/2017 dated 27.12.2017 registered at Police Station Khyala and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

CRL.M.C. 6071/2019 Page 1 of 3

3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 23.04.2016 as per Hindu rites and rituals. However, due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 21.05.2017.

5. The petitioner and respondent no.2, with the advice and guidance of the family members and relatives, have arrived at an amicable settlement vide a MOU dated 16.09.2019 thereby resolving all their disputes and differences and have started living together as husband and wife in a rented accommodation.

6. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by ASI Jamil of Police Station Khyala and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

5. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

CRL.M.C. 6071/2019 Page 2 of 3

6. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 380/2017 dated 27.12.2017 registered at Police Station Khyala and consequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

7. The petition is allowed accordingly.

8. Order dasti

9. Pending application stands disposed of as infructuous.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE NOVEMBER 28, 2019 sm CRL.M.C. 6071/2019 Page 3 of 3