Laxmi Narain @ Pappy & Ors vs State (Nct Of Delhi) & Ors

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 39 Del
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2019

Delhi High Court
Laxmi Narain @ Pappy & Ors vs State (Nct Of Delhi) & Ors on 7 January, 2019
*     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                         Date of Order: January 07, 2019

+     CRL.M.C. 5033/2017
      LAXMI NARAIN @ PAPPY & ORS           ..... Petitioners
                   Through: Mr. Mayank Mohan, Advocate

                     Versus

      STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS                 .....Respondents
                    Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional
                              Public Prosecutor for respondent-
                              State with SI Ranbir Singh
                              Respondents No.2, 3 & 5 are
                              present in person
      CORAM:
      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

                          ORDER

(ORAL) Crl.M.A.19884/2017 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions.

Crl.M.A.19885/2017 (delay) There is delay of 02 days in re-filing the accompanying petition. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and the delay is condoned.

The application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 5033/2017 & Crl.M.A. 19883/2017 (stay)

1. Quashing of FIR No.209/2012, under Sections 323/354/34 of IPC registered at police station Nangloi, Delhi is sought in this petition on the CRL.M.C. 5033/2017 Page 1 of 3 basis of Mediated Settlement of 3rd September, 2015 (Annexure P-2).

2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI Ranbir Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondents No.3 & 5 are also present in the Court and they submit that they have instructions from respondents No.4, 6 & 7 to submit that they respondents shall abide by the aforesaid Mediated Settlement (Annexure P-2). As per aforesaid Mediated Settlement (Annexure P-2), complainant of the FIR in question has to be compensated.

3. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved vide aforesaid Mediated Settlement (Annexure P-2) and that she has already received part compensation of `20,000/- .

4. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners have brought compensation of `40,000/- in cash, which has been handed over to respondent No.2, who has accepted it. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners are neighbours of respondents and petitioners have undertaken to pay the balance compensation amount of `10,000/- in cash to her within two days from today. This is acceptable to respondents. Let it be so done.

5. In the facts and circumstances of this case, this petition and the application are disposed of with direction to respondent No.2-Renu to hand over her affidavit regarding the Mediated Settlement (Annexure P-2) CRL.M.C. 5033/2017 Page 2 of 3 being fully acted upon, to petitioners after receiving the entire compensation and thereafter, petitioners shall place the said affidavit before the trial court on the date fixed. If it is so done, then the proceedings arising out of the FIR in question be brought to an end by the trial court.

6. With aforesaid directions, this petition and the application are disposed of.

Dasti.

(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE JANUARY 07, 2019 s CRL.M.C. 5033/2017 Page 3 of 3