* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Order: February 15, 2019
+ CRL.M.C. 1878/2017
STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional
Pubic Prosecutor for State
Versus
POONAM & ORS .....Respondents
Through: Respondents in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
ORDER
(ORAL) Trial court vide order of 27th August, 2016 (Annexure P-1) has refused to take cognizance of the charge-sheet filed for the offences under Sections 323/341/506/34 of IPC while holding that the prima-facie case under Sections 323/506 of IPC is made out and both offences are non- cognizable. Aforesaid order has been upheld by the Revisional Court vide impugned order of 1st October, 2016.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for petitioner-State relies upon decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Crl.M.C. 4966/2014 titled as 'Vijay Kumar Wadhawan Vs. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr., 2015 SCC Online DEL 12454 to submit that for non- cognizable offences, a complaint by a private person is maintainable.
Upon hearing, I find that there is no dispute with aforesaid proposition. Petitioner may apprise to the complainant about it, who may file a private complaint against respondent if she so chooses.
CRL. M.C.1878/2017 Page 1 of 2With aforesaid observations, this petition is accordingly disposed of.
Dasti.
(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE FEBRUARY 15, 2019 p'ma CRL. M.C.1878/2017 Page 2 of 2