$~12
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Judgment delivered on: 27.08.2019
+ C.R.P. 103/2018
NARENDER KUMAR POPLI ..... Petitioner
versus
SADAN BATRA ..... Respondent
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Priyanka Garg with Mr. Sanjeev K. Pabbi,
Advocates.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ruchir Batra, Advocate.
CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JUDGMENT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) C.R.P. 103/2018 & CM APPL.20603/2018 (stay)
1. Petitioner impugns order dated 23.03.2018, whereby, the application of the petitioner seeking condonation of delay in filing the written statement and the right to defend the suit has been closed.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that initially copy of the annexures to the plaint were not supplied and they were supplied on 16.09.2017 and the written statement was filed on 20.12.2017, with a delay of about 14 days. She submits that there was a lapse on the CRL.REV.P.103/2018 Page 1 of 2 part of the earlier counsel.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that an opportunity be granted to the petitioner to defend the suit subject to terms.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent denies the averments of the petitioner, however, submits that without prejudice and to avoid any further delay in the proceedings, he has no objection in case the written statement filed by the petitioner is taken on record subject to terms and he is permitted to defend the Suit.
5. In view of the above, order dated 23.03.2018 is set aside. Subject to petitioner paying the costs of Rs.10,000/- to the respondent on the next date of hearing, i.e. 30.08.2019, before the Trial Court, The written statement filed by the petitioner shall be taken on record and the Trial Court shall proceed further from that stage.
6. Petition is allowed in the above terms.
7. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J AUGUST 27, 2019 st CRL.REV.P.103/2018 Page 2 of 2