$~3
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C)No.7572/2017
% Date of decision : 7th December, 2017
KUSUM LATA ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr. Brajesh Pandey, Mrs.
Sudha Rani Saxena and Mr.
Priyanshu Upadhyay, Advs.
versus
DELHI TRANSPORT
CORPORATION AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through : Ms. Aditi Gupta, Adv.
for R-1/DTC.
Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Adv. for
R-2/GNCTD.
Mr. Shambhu, Adv. for R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
1. This writ petition makes a general prayer that there are some employees working in the Delhi Transport Corporation, who have submitted fake proof of age and as a result, they are continuing in service even after completing the prescribed retirement age. In this W.P.(C)No.7572/2017 Page 1 of 2 regard, the petitioner has enclosed certificates relating to one employee of the Delhi Transport Corporation.
2. Ms. Aditi Gupta, ld. counsel representing the respondent no.1 - Delhi Transport Corporation has placed before us the notings dated 20th November, 2017 and 29th November, 2017 which manifest that the respondent no.1 has initiated inquiry into the certificates produced by the petitioner along with the writ petition. Ms. Aditi Gupta, ld. counsel for respondent no.1 states that premised on the outcome of inquiry, necessary action would be taken in accordance with law.
3. In view of the fact that the respondent no.1 - Delhi Transport Corporation is taking action in accordance with law on the complaint made by the petitioner, this writ petition need not detain us any further.
This writ petition is hereby disposed of.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR, J DECEMBER 07, 2017 aj W.P.(C)No.7572/2017 Page 2 of 2