$~18.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 3559/2012 and I.A. 18799/2014
SWARN KANTA PUNJ ..... Plaintiff
Through: None
versus
SURABHI GEHLOT & ORS ..... Defendants
Through: Mr. Sumit Gahlawat, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
ORDER
% 03.12.2015
1. Learned counsel for the defendants states that aggrieved by the rejection order dated 08.07.2013 passed in I.A.5932/2013, an application filed by the defendants under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, the defendants had filed an appeal before the Division Bench, registered as FAO(OS) 367/2013. Further, aggrieved by the order dated 06.08.2013 passed in I.A.1035/2013, an application filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC, the defendants had filed another appeal before the Division Bench, registered as FAO(OS) 420/2013. The decisions in the said appeals were being awaited.
2. Today, counsel for the defendants hands over a copy of the common judgment dated 18.09.2015, passed by the Division Bench, whererunder both the appeals have been allowed and the present suit CS(OS) 3559/2012 Page 1 of 2 has been rejected. Further, the order dated 06.08.2013, granting an interim injunction in favour of the plaintiff has been set aside. The said judgment is taken on record.
3. In view of the above position, nothing further survives for adjudication in the present suit, which has been rejected. The suit is disposed of alongwith the pending application.
HIMA KOHLI, J DECEMBER 03, 2015 rkb/ap CS(OS) 3559/2012 Page 2 of 2