* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RESERVED ON: 18.08.2011
PRONOUNCED ON: 31.10.2011
+ CRL.A. 317/2006
DILSHAD @ KALE ..... Appellant
versus
STATE THRU C.B.I ..... Respondent
+ CRL.A. 290/2006
ANIL ..... Appellant
versus
STATE ..... Respondent
+ CRL.A. 972/2006
DEVENDER ..... Appellant
versus
STATE ..... Respondent
+ CRL.A. 598/2008
RAVINDER S/O SH. KUMUDI ..... Appellant
versus
THE STATE ..... Respondent
+ CRL.A. 1020/2008
RAVI KUMAR @ SONU @ CHANDU ..... Appellant
versus
STATE ..... Respondent
Presence: Ms. Reena Singh, Ms. Priyanka Singh and Mr. Ajay Singh, Advocates for appellant in Crl. A.972/2006. Ms. Purnima Sethi, Advocate for appellant in Crl.A.598/2008 & 1020/2008.
Mr. Narender Mann, Special P.P. for CBI along with Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate for respondent - CBI.
Crl. A.317, 290, & 972/2006, 598 & 1020/2008 Page 1 CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers YES may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to Reporter or not? YES
3. Whether the judgment should be YES reported in the Digest?
MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT The present criminal appeals are allowed in terms of the separate judgment passed today in Criminal Appeal No.497/2006 titled Satinder @ Bawa v. State through C.B.I.
For detailed order please see the above mentioned judgment.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) G. P. MITTAL (JUDGE) OCTOBER 31, 2011 Crl. A.317, 290, & 972/2006, 598 & 1020/2008 Page 2