Ravinder Kapoor vs Sushma Kapoor & Anr

Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 5152 Del
Judgement Date : 19 October, 2011

Delhi High Court
Ravinder Kapoor vs Sushma Kapoor & Anr on 19 October, 2011
Author: Suresh Kait
$~46
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+              CRL. Rev. P. No.464/2011

%              Judgment delivered on:19th October, 2011

RAVINDER KAPOOR                                     ..... Petitioner
                               Through : Mr. Mukesh M. Goel, Adv.

                          versus

SUSHMA KAPOOR & ANR                  ..... Respondent
                 Through : Respondent No. 1 in person.
                           Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Addl.
                           PP/R-2

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

     1. Whether the Reporters of local papers
        may be allowed to see the judgment?                NO
     2. To be referred to Reporter or not?                 NO
     3. Whether the judgment should be reported            NO
        in the Digest?

SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)

Crl. M.A.12375/2011 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. REV. P. 464/2011 & M.B.1826/2011

1. Notice of the petition and application is accepted by Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Addl. PP on behalf of the State/Respondent No. 2. Respondent No. 1 is personally Crl.Rev. P. No.464/2011 Page 1 of 3 present in the court and accepts notice.

2. The instant revision petition has been filed challenging order dated 12.10.2011 of the learned Sessions Judge in Crl. Appeal No. 8/2011 whereby judgment dated 10.01.2011 of the trial court has been upheld and order on sentence dated 15.01.2011 awarding sentence of one year SI was reduced to SI for 6 months. Vide the trial court judgment the petitioner was directed to pay a sum of Rs.4.5 lakh as compensation also.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that total amount of Rs.4.5 lakh has been paid by the petitioner to the complainant and the complainant does not want to pursue this matter any further.

4. Since the complainant has come forward and wants to compound the case, therefore, in the interest of justice and as provided under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, the same stands compounded.

5. Consequently, the petitioner is acquitted from the case.

6. Accordingly, Jail authorities are directed to release the petitioner forthwith, if not required in any other case.

7. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned Crl.Rev. P. No.464/2011 Page 2 of 3 Superintendent.

8. The petition stands disposed of.

9. No order as to costs.

SURESH KAIT, J October 19th 2011 Awanish Crl.Rev. P. No.464/2011 Page 3 of 3