* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ WP(C) No.7534/2011
% Date of Decision: 17.10.2011
ASI Suraj Jaiswal & Ors. .... Petitioners
Through Ms. Rekha Palli, Advocate for the
petitioner
Versus
UOI & Ors. .... Respondents
Through Mr. S.M. Arif, Advocate for respondents
No. 1 & 2
Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the
respondents No. 3 & 4
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may NO
be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be NO
reported in the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
* After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to make a fresh representation raising all the grievances available to the petitioner WP(C) No.7534/2011 Page 1 of 2 in the facts and circumstances in the law without prejudice to the pleas and contentions raised in the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
It would be open to the petitioner to raise the points raised in the present petition.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
OCTOBER 17, 2011.
rs WP(C) No.7534/2011 Page 2 of 2