UNREPORTABLE
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
WP (C) No.3451/2011
Date of Decision: May 26, 2011
ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner
through Mr. G.D.Bhandari, Advocate
versus
BHAWAN'S SAWAN PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS ..... Respondents
through Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan, ASC for
respondents No.3 & 4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE REKHA SHARMA
1. Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see
the judgment? No
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the 'Digest'? No
REKHA SHARMA, J. (ORAL)
This writ-petition has been preferred against memorandum dated April 13, 2011 whereby respondent No.2 after considering the report of the Inquiry Officer, nature of charges and recommendations of the Disciplinary Committee, has proposed imposition of major penalty of removal of the petitioner from service as per provisions of Rule 117(b)(iii) of Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 and has given an opportunity to the petitioner to make WP (C) No.3451/2011 Page 1 representation, if any, against the proposed penalty. The petitioner instead of making a representation to the School Authorities has come to this Court, alleging that the charge-sheet served upon him and the inquiry held pursuant thereto are liable to be quashed, on the ground that the charge-sheet is vague and the inquiry report is based on no evidence at all.
On a perusal of the writ-petition, I find that the petitioner has made no prayer for either the quashing of the charge-sheet or the inquiry report. The only prayer that has been made is for quashing of the impugned memorandum of April 13, 2011. In my view, the writ-petition is pre-mature, as no order so far has been passed regarding the proposed punishment of dismissal.
The writ-petition has no merit. The same is dismissed.
REKHA SHARMA, J.
MAY 26, 2011 ka WP (C) No.3451/2011 Page 2