* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P(C) No.8261/2009
% Date of Decision: 17.03.2011
UOI & Anr. ...... Petitioners
Through Mr. Ravi Sikri, Advocate
Versus
L.S. Rawat & Ors. ...... Respondents
Through Ms. Priyanka M. Bhardwaj, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be No
allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in No
the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
CM Nos. 5048/2009 & 3760/2011 These are the applications by the petitioners for taking on record some additional documents, which were not before the Tribunal and additional affidavits, which were also not considered by the Tribunal.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the writ petition to raise these grounds and rely on additional documents while seeking review of the impugned order passed by the Tribunal.
WP(C) 8261 of 2009 Page 1 of 2
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for in accordance with law.
All the pending applications are also disposed of.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
March 17, 2011. VEENA BIRBAL, J.
'rs' WP(C) 8261 of 2009 Page 2 of 2