* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.6003/2010
Date of Decision: July 14, 2011
UOI & ORS. ...... Petitioners
Through None.
versus
I. YESHUDANAM ..... Respondent
Through None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
ANIL KUMAR, J. (ORAL)
1. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner though the matter was passed over once.
2. Office report indicates that the notice could not be issued as the process fee and the address were not filed by the petitioners.
3. On 6th April, 2011, it had transpired that the notice was not issued pursuant to the order dated 21st January, 2011 as the steps were not taken by the petitioner.
4. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. WP(C) No.6003/2010 Page 1 of 2 CM No.11820/2010
5. Since the main petition has been dismissed in default and for non-prosecution, this application does not survive and the same is dismissed. The interim order dated 6th September, 2010 is vacated.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
JULY 14, 2011 dr WP(C) No.6003/2010 Page 2 of 2