* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CM No.1641/2010 & W.P.(C) No.1373/2005
% Date of Decision: 07.02.2011
Director of Education .... Petitioner
Through Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate.
Versus
Mrs.Sara Verma & Anr. .... Respondents
Through Mr.Puneet Taneja, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may NO
be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be NO
reported in the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
* This is an application by the petitioner/applicant to take on record the office memorandum dated 10th July, 1977 and 24th October, 1978. The applicant has contended that the abovenoted office memorandums are relevant, however, no grounds for not producing them earlier before this Court or before the Tribunal have been disclosed in the application.
W.P(C) No.1373/2005 Page 1 of 2
In any case the validity of the order of the Tribunal cannot be adjudicated on the basis of these office memorandums which were not before the Tribunal and which had not been considered while passing the order dated 14th July, 2004 and 2nd September, 2004 in O.A No.2240/2002.
In the circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions seeks to withdraw the petition and the application with liberty to seek review of the order dated 14th July, 2004 and 2nd September, 2004 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, principal bench, New Delhi on the basis of abovenoted office memorandums.
In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. No order about costs.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
VEENA BIRBAL, J.
FEBRUARY 07, 2011 'k' W.P(C) No.1373/2005 Page 2 of 2