Chattisgarh High Court
Gram Panchayat Jamuniya vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 14 March, 2026
1
Digitally
signed by
SHAYNA
KADRI 2026:CGHC:12309
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NATIONAL LOK ADALAT
Judge - Lok Adalat : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Member - Lok Adalat : Mr. Apoorva Tripathi, Advocate
WPC No. 5212 of 2024
1 - Gram Panchayat Jamuniya, Janpad Panchayat-Kawardha, District-
Kabirdham (C.G.) Through Sarpanch, Smt. Urmila Banjare W/o Shri
Chandra Bhushan Banjare, Aged About-55 Years, R/o Village-Jamuniya,
Post-Kawardha, Janpad Panchayat-Kawardha, District-Kabirdham
(C.G.)
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Ministry Of Panchayat And
Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa
Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.)
2 - Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Vikas Bhawan, Ground Floor,
North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.)
3 - Collector, Kawardha, District-Kabirdham (C.G.)
4 - Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kawardha, District-
Kabirdham (C.G.)
5 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Kawardha, District-
Kabirdham (C.G.)
... Respondent(s)
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System) 2 For Petitioner : Mrs. Urmila Banjare, Petitioner In-person appeared before this Court For : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, G. A., Mr. Jitendra State/Respondents Shrivastava, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Shah Poyam, C.E.O., Janpad Panchayat, Kabirdham and Mr. Harishankar Chouhan, Deputy Commissioner, Bilaspur.
AWARD (Passed on 14/03/2026)
1. The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 19.03.2024 issued by respondent No. 5 and the letter dated 13.09.2024 issued by respondent No. 4, Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kabirdham.
2. Today, both the parties filed compromise application stating that the cancelled construction work has been approved under other schemes and the payment for said work has been made from the office of Janpad Panchayat Kawardha. Hence both the parties compromised the dispute amicably and as such nothing remains in this petition for adjudication.
3. The contesting parties to this petition have amicably settled/compromised the dispute. We have also found that the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just, proper and legal and hence are acceptable. We accordingly accept the compromise/ settlement, proposed by the parties.
3
4. A copy of this compromise/docket arrived at by the parties be made part of this record.
5. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) (Apoorva Tripathi)
Judge - Lok Adalat Member - Lok Adalat
High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh
Shayna