Chattisgarh High Court
Yadunandan Rajput vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 9 March, 2026
1
NAFR
Digitally
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
signed by
SOURABH
SOURABH PATEL
PATEL Date:
2026.03.09
17:17:37
+0530
CRA No. 621 of 2026
1 - Yadunandan Rajput S/o Rohit Rajput, Aged About 29 Years, R/o
Village Tribhuwanpur, P.S. And Tehsil Sargaon, Distt. Mungeli, C.G.,
At Present R/o Village Khaira, P.S. And Tahsil Nandghat, Distt.
Bemetara, Chhattisgarh.
... Appellant
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, P.S.
Nandghat, Distt. Bemetara, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent
For Appellant : Ms. Manisha Yadav, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Bharat Rajput, Adv.
For Respondent/State : Mr. Aman Tamrakar, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 09.03.2026
1. This appeal under Section 14-A(ii) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short "the SC/ST Act") has been preferred by the appellant against the order dated 19.02.2026 passed by the Special Judge, SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Bemetara (C.G.), whereby the anticipatory bail application filed by the appellant under Section 482 of BNSS in connection with Crime No. 14/2026 registered at Police Station Nandghat, District-Bemetara (C.G.) for 2 commission of offence punishable under Sections 296, 351(3), 115(2), 117(2), 3(5) of BNS and Section 3(1)(s) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been rejected.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has already been arrested, therefore, the present appeal has become infructuous.
3. In view of submission made by learned counsel for the appellant, the present appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/-
(Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Sourabh P.