Tantia Construction Ltd vs State Of Bihar Road Construction ...

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3046 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Tantia Construction Ltd vs State Of Bihar Road Construction ... on 16 April, 2026

Author: Shampa Sarkar
Bench: Shampa Sarkar
OD-10 & 11

                   IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                            ORIGINAL SIDE

                              EC/358/2016
                 IA NO: GA/1/2017 (Old No:GA/3499/2017),
                          GA/2/2021, GA/3/2021

                        TANTIA CONSTRUCTION LTD
                                   VS
             STATE OF BIHAR ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT

                                  AND

                              RVWO/9/2019
                      IA NO: GA/1/2019, GA/2/2019

             STATE OF BIHAR ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT
                                   VS
                        TANTIA CONSTRUCTION LTD



  BEFORE:
  The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR
  Date : 16th April, 2026.


                                                                      Appearance:
                                                    Mr. Swatarup Banerjee, Adv.
                                                         Mr. Avishek Guha, Adv.
                                                    Mr.Nirmalya Dasgupta, Adv.
                                                          Sk. Sariful Haque, Adv.
                                                    Mr. Ankush Majumdar, Adv.
                                         . . .for the petitioner in EC/358/2016
                                           and Respondent in RVWO/9/2019.

                                                      Mr. Abhrajit Mitra, Sr. Adv.
                                                       Mr. Anirban Ray, Sr. Adv.
                                                    Mr.Arnab Basu Mullick, Adv.
                                        . . .for the petitioner in RVWO/9/2019
                                              and respondent in EC/358/2016.

                                    .

2 The Court: Although, Mr. Mitra learned senior advocate has submitted that there was no specific direction for payment of money and the award was not in the nature of a money decree, Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate for the award-holder, submits that parts of the claims had been allowed upon directing payments. Several notices were also issued by the award debtor to the award holder to appear before them for necessary steps in the matter towards satisfaction of the award.

However, those attempts have failed.

Under such circumstances, this Court is of the view that the IA-GAs will be first decided.

Let this matter be adjourned for the day.

(SHAMPA SARKAR, J.) SP/b.pal.