Bombay High Court
Charumitra Rajwardhan Kamble (Minor vs . on 21 May, 2026
12-2089-2026-wp.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2089 OF 2026
Charumitra Rajwardhan Kamble (Minor)
Through Next Friend Father Rajwardhan Y. Kamble
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra, through the Chief Secretary and Ors
Ms. Ahilya Nalawade, advocate for the petitioner
Mr. R. P. Kadam, AGP for the State
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 21st MAY, 2026
(VACATION C0URT)
P. C. :
Digitally signed
1. Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. IRESH by IRESH MASHAL MASHAL Date: 2026.05.21 18:34:58 +0530
2. Present petitioner, six years child belongs to reserve category is before this Court through her natural guardian ensuring enforcement of a right, which is a fundamental right under Article 21A of the Constitution of India, by virtue of 86 Amendment Act vis- a-vis the Statutory right in view of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2009 ('the said Act'). Equally, the Act of 2009 places an obligation on State authorities to provide and ensure admission, attendance and completion of elementary education to every child in the age group of 6 to 14.
Iresh 1 of 4
::: Uploaded on - 21/05/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 21/05/2026 21:20:38 :::
12-2089-2026-wp.doc
3. The record reveals that the petitioner applied for admission to the 1st standard for the academic year 2026-2027, commencing from 10/06/2026, indicating Respondent No. 9, the school located immediate to the place of residence of the petitioner. The State authorities while not processing the application presented by the Petitioner under Section 12(1) of the said Act, have failed to process the application presented by the Petitioner, taking recourse to the impeding stipulation contained in the communication dated 13/02/2026, which mandates that in case of parents residing in tenanted premises, a leave and license agreement must be registered. As such, the application cannot be processed.
4. The petitioner's right to admission in the school in the nearby vicinity cannot be defeated merely due to the non-registration of the leave and license agreement. It amounts to tinkering/militating against the fundamental right of the petitioner.
5. The submission of the respondent-State authorities that the said stipulation, much less the impugned clause, has been incorporated in the communication, which is in the nature of an administrative instruction, to ensure that preference is given only to Iresh 2 of 4 ::: Uploaded on - 21/05/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 21/05/2026 21:20:38 ::: 12-2089-2026-wp.doc neighbourhood children, cannot be countenanced, since the enactment of 2009 has an overriding effect in view of Article 254 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, prima facie the stipulation appears to be unsustainable. In any case, the said stipulation shall not be weaponized by the authorities to cause any delay or defeat the petitioner's admission. The affidavit of the parent(s) indicating the age and residence of the child shall be sufficient to ensure the admission of the petitioner to the school indicated in application in view of Section 12(1) of the Act of 2009.
6. In that view of the matter, I am of the considered view that this Court cannot be a silent spectator to the act of the State, which tinkers with the right of the petitioner to refuse admission of the petitioner. The right of the petitioner is not only a fundamental right but also a statutory one, which obligates the State to ensure that every child within the 6 to 14 age group is essentially admitted to school and further ensures completion of elementary education. Therefore, under any eventuality gloss cannot be created on the right of the petitioner.
7. Given these circumstances, the following directions are issued to the respondent-authorities:
Iresh 3 of 4
::: Uploaded on - 21/05/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 21/05/2026 21:20:38 :::
12-2089-2026-wp.doc
I. The application presented by the petitioner should
be processed within five days from today; irrespective of the closure of the portal, if required, such processing shall be carried out manually, and grant provisional admission with respondent no. 9, while conferring the benefits to which the petitioner is lawfully entitled under freeship/any other quota.
II. Education Officer, Primary, Zilla Parishad Kolhapur shall ensure that this order is complied with, thereby enrolling the petitioner's name in student data base. III. Apart from above, Deputy Director of Education, Kolhapur shall monitor that this order is complied and petitioner is not prevented in any manner from ensuring her admission in the ensuing academic year 2026-2027, commencing from 10/06/2026.
IV. Non-compliance of this order by the aforesaid authorities would entail disciplinary action including action under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. V. It is made clear that under any eventuality, technicalities should not be cited as a ground to delay or defeat the admission of the petitioner.
8. Stand over to 11/06/2026, High on Board.
9. Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order.
[SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.]
Iresh 4 of 4
::: Uploaded on - 21/05/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 21/05/2026 21:20:38 :::