Sachin Gautam Matre And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 5313 Bom
Judgement Date : 20 May, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Sachin Gautam Matre And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 20 May, 2026

2026:BHC-AS:22688



                                                                              26. ABA 1372-2026.doc



                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                          ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1372 OF 2026

           1. Mr. Sachin Gautam Matre                               )
           2. Lakhan Gautam Matre                                   )...       Applicants
                    Versus
           The State of Maharashtra                                 )...    Respondent
                                               -----
           Mr. Prashant S. Hagare for the Applicants.
           Ms. Rashmi Tendulkar, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
           Mr. Rupesh Zade for the Complainant.
           Mr. Navnath S. Bhagvat, Police Constable, Daund Police Station, Pune
           Rural, present.

                                                          -----

                                                   CORAM : SANDESH D. PATIL, J.

                                                   DATE     : 20th MAY 2026
                                                              (VACATION COURT)
           P.C. :

           1)                Pre-arrest bail is sought for in connection with C.R. No.198

           of 2026, registered with Daund Police Station, Tal. Daund, Dist. Pune,

           for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 118(1),

           351(2), 352, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.



           2)              Mr. Prashant Hagare, learned Counsel appearing for the

           Applicants submits that the case of the complainant is that on 30 th

           March, 2026 at 05.30 p.m. he was sitting in front of the house, at that

           RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                                   1/4


                    ::: Uploaded on - 22/05/2026                    ::: Downloaded on - 23/05/2026 01:15:36 :::
                                                              26. ABA 1372-2026.doc



time, the accused, who is the cousin brother in law of the complainant

came there and started abusing her.          The fight was regarding taking

water through the pipeline. He submits there was a fight between two

families, as a result of which, cross complaints were lodged against

each other. He has invited my attention to the FIR. The contention is

that nothing is to be recovered at his instance. He further submits that

the other co-accused, Pranita and Chhaya granted interim protection

by this Court.



3)              Mr. Rupesh Zade, the learned Counsel         appearing for the

Complainant submits that the role of the accused is revealed clearly

from the FIR. He submits that prima facie case is made out against the

Applicant. He submits that custodial interrogation is necessary, because

the Applicants have caused grievous hurt to the present complainant.

He submits that no relief be granted to the present Applicant.



4)              Ms. Rashmi Tendulkar, the learned A.P.P. for the Respondent-

State, on instructions of the Officer present, submits that when

Anticipatory Bail Application No.1312 of 2026 of the co-accused was

listed before this Court on 15th May, 2026, the Officer fairly stated that


RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                             2/4


         ::: Uploaded on - 22/05/2026              ::: Downloaded on - 23/05/2026 01:15:36 :::
                                                                26. ABA 1372-2026.doc



since there are cross complaints between the Applicants and the

complainant, therefore, custody is not necessary. He also added that

there is nothing to be recovered at the hands of the present Applicant.



5)              Heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties. The present

dispute arose over as a result of fight over water from the pipeline. The

parties are related to each other. There are cross cases. Nothing is to

be recovered from the Applicants.             It appears that fight was not

premeditated. In the circumstances, the following Order is passed.



                                        :ORDER:

(i) In the event of arrest, the Applicants-Sachin Gautam Matre and Lakhan Gautam Matre, be released on bail in connection with C.R. 198/2026, registered with Daund Police Station, Tal. Daund, Dist. Pune, for the offences punishable u/s 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each, with one or two sureties in the like amount.

RaJesh Chittewan, PS 3/4 ::: Uploaded on - 22/05/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 23/05/2026 01:15:36 :::

26. ABA 1372-2026.doc

(ii) The Applicants shall report to the Investing Officer of the concerned Police Station on 23 rd May, 2026 to 26th May, 2026 from 10.00 a.m. to 01.00 p.m. and, thereafter, as and when called for.

(iii) Accordingly, Anticipatory Bail Application No.1372 of 2026 is disposed of.




                                                      (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)




RaJesh Chittewan, PS                                                                4/4
             Digitally signed
RAJESH       by RAJESH
             VASANT
VASANT       CHITTEWAN
CHITTEWAN    Date: 2026.05.22
             19:22:13 +0530
         ::: Uploaded on - 22/05/2026                 ::: Downloaded on - 23/05/2026 01:15:36 :::