Devidas Pitambar Chaudhary vs The State Of Maharashtra Through The ...

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 5240 Bom
Judgement Date : 19 May, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Devidas Pitambar Chaudhary vs The State Of Maharashtra Through The ... on 19 May, 2026

                                                       941 943 WP 5326 26+.odt

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

               941 WRIT PETITION NO. 5326 OF 2026

                     ULHAS SHAMKANT DESHMUKH
                                  VERSUS
 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THOUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS
                                     ...
              Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Pawar Ajay D.
          AGP for Respondent nos. 1 to 5 & 7 : Mr. R. K. Ingole
                                     ...
                  943 WRIT PETITION NO. 5328 OF 2026
                        KIRAN RAMANLAL SHAH
                                  VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OHTERS
                                     ...
              Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Pawar Ajay D.
             AGP for Respondents 1 to 5 & 7: Mr. R.K. Ingole
                                     ...
              WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 14792 OF 2026
            DEVIDAS PITAMBAR CHAUDHARY AND OTHERS
                                  VERSUS
              THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                     ...
                Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Ajay D. Pawar
         A.G.P. for Respondents/State 1 to 5 & 7 : Mr. R.S. Wani
                                     ...
              WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 14793 OF 2026
                  AJAY HIRAMAN PAWAR AND OTHERS
                                  VERSUS
              THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                     ...
                Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Ajay D. Pawar
        A.G.P. for Respondents/State 1 to 5 & 7 : Mr. B. A. Shinde
                                     ...
              WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO. 14794 OF 2026
                 SANDIP PRAVIN BHAVSAR AND OTHERS
                                  VERSUS
              THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                     ...
                Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Ajay D. Pawar
        A.G.P. for Respondents/State 1 to 5 & 7 : Mr. V. K. Kotecha
                                ...
               CORAM                  : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.

VACATION COURT DATE : 19.05.2026 1/2 941 943 WP 5326 26+.odt PER COURT :

Writ Petition (stamp) nos. 14792/2026, 14793/2026 and 14794/2026, are not on board. Taken on board, on mentioning.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are owners of the properties and without giving notices to them, the Sub Division Engineer PWD issued the impugned notices dated 13.05.2026 to the petitioners to remove the encroachment by 21.05.2026.
4. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are not the encroachers. They are owners of the property. The respondent-Sub Division Engineer did not issue any show cause notices to the petitioners and without giving prior notice, directly the respondent directed to remove the encroachment by 21.05.2026.
5. In view thereof, I am inclined to issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 25.06.2026. The learned A.G.P. waives service for respondent nos. 1 to 5 and 7.
6. In the meantime, there shall be ad interim relief in terms of prayer clause 'D', which reads thus:
"(D) To grant stay to operation, execution and implementation of encroachment notices dated 13.05.2026 issued by respondent no. 5-Sub Divisional Engineer, PWD, Sub-Division, Sindkheda, Tq. Sindkheda, Dist. Dhule, till pending hearing and final disposal of the present writ petitions".

( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) mkd/-

2/2