[Cites 1, Cited by 0]
Bombay High Court
Ratnamala Alias Gauri Bhagwan Wadghule vs The State Of Maharashtra on 18 May, 2026
39.APPLN.1922.2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1922 OF 2026
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 371 OF 2026
Kalyan Bhausaheb Barhate and Others ...Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
***
Mr. N. S. Ghanekar, Advocate for the Applicants
Mr. Sachin G. Joshi, APP for Respondent - State.
***
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
(VACATION COURT) DATE : MAY 18, 2026 PER COURT :
1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent - State.
2. By the present application, the applicant seeks suspension of substantive sentence imposed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gangapur, District Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 367 of 2025.
3. Considering that the appeal would take considerable time for final hearing and final disposal on merits, I am inclined to grant relief in terms of prayer clause (B).
Shrikant Malani Page 1 of 2
39.APPLN.1922.2026.odt
4. Accordingly, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B), which read as under :
"B) Pending hearing and final disposal of the criminal appeal, substantive sentence may kindly be suspended and applicants may kindly be released on bail in Sessions Case No.367 of 2025 bearing crime no. 218 of 2018 registered with Gangapur Police Sation, Tq. Gangapur, Dist. Aurangabad for the offences punishable under Section 332, 323, 353 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code."
( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) Shrikant Malani Page 2 of 2