[Cites 0, Cited by 0]
Bombay High Court
Jagdish Ramnaresh Yadav vs The State Of Maharashtra Thro. Govt. ... on 15 May, 2026
19-WP-6624-2026 (C).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6624 OF 2026
Jagdish Ramnaresh Yadav ...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Thro. Govt. Pleader ...Respondent
__________
Mr. Sandeep S. Patade, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Ashwini A. Purav, AGP for the Respondent - State.
__________
CORAM : ADVAIT M. SETHNA &
SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 15 MAY 2026 (VACATION COURT) P.C.:
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the subject structure as set out in the Petition is situated on the property in respect of which the Circle Officer has issued the demolition notice. He submits that the Circle Officer has no jurisdiction to pass such an order. He further submits that due process of law has not been followed.
2. Ms. Purav, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent-State, seeks time to file an Affidavit-in-Reply. Time is granted.
3. Considering the above, by way of an ad-interim order, until the next date, the subject structure (Supra) shall not be demolished. Mayur Page 1 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 15/05/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 16/05/2026 03:41:17 :::
19-WP-6624-2026 (C).doc
4. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
5. Stand over to 17 June 2026.
[SANDESH D. PATIL, J] [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] Mayur Page 2 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 15/05/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 16/05/2026 03:41:17 :::