[Cites 0, Cited by 0]
Bombay High Court
Manda Uttam Ambekar And Others vs Priyanka Rushab Ambekar And Another on 14 May, 2026
1 901wp4114.2026..odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 4114 of 2026
(Manda Uttam Ambekar and ors Vs. Priyanka Rushab Ambekar and anr)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.
and Registrar's Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Vaibhav Patre, Advocate for petitioners.
CORAM: RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.
DATE: 14.05.2026
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. In brief, the learned counsel has argued that the
petitioners are the mother and sisters of the husband of the
respondent no.1. According to him, the proceedings were
filed by resplendent no.1 against the son of the petitioner no.1
which were of matrimonial nature. Ultimately, the
maintenance order was passed against the son of the
petitioner no.1 and non payment of which, had resulted into
preferring an application for attachment of the property at the
instance of the wife. The said application was allowed and it
was directed that the property in question be put to an auction
and the amount be then adjusted towards the maintenance.
3. Mr. Patre, the learned counsel has contended that
the property in question is jointly owned by all the petitioners.
In view of the submissions made, following order is passed:
2 901wp4114.2026..odt
ORDER
i) Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 9.6.2026.
ii) In addition to regular mode, service by all permissible modes is granted.
iii) In the meanwhile, there shall be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (iii) of the petition.
(RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.) Belkhede, PS