Narendra Chhatra Bhuj Bhanushali vs Municipal Corporation Of Greater ...

Bombay High Court

Narendra Chhatra Bhuj Bhanushali vs Municipal Corporation Of Greater ... on 14 May, 2026

          Digitally
          signed by                                                        5-WPL-17225-2026.doc
          RUPALI
RUPALI    RAJESH
RAJESH    WAKODIKAR
WAKODIKAR Date:
          2026.05.14
          15:13:19        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
          +0530

                                 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                            WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 17225 OF 2026


                  Narendra Chhatra Bhuj Bhanushali                            ...Petitioner
                       Versus
                  The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai                 ...Respondent


                  Mr. Kirti Munshi, Senior Counsel a/w Mr. Zubin Morris, Mr. Nirav
                  Shah & Ms. Niharika Singh a/w Ms. Richika Kadam i/b Little & Co.
                  for the Petitioner.

                  Ms. Smita Tondwalkar for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 - BMC.

                  Mr. Khirish Limje, Sub-Engineer (B & F) P/S ward, BMC, present.

                  Mr. Vikramjit Garewal a/w Mr. Vijay Singh, Mr. Avinashh Hassija i/b
                  Anisha Singh Sharma for the Respondent No.5.

                  Mr. Bhavin Shah a/w Mr. Dhawal Ved i/b Dhawal Ved for the
                  Respondent Nos.6 to 8.


                                             CORAM : ADVAIT M. SETHNA &
                                                     SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 14th MAY, 2026 (VACATION COURT) P.C. :

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

5-WPL-17225-2026.doc

2. This petition has been moved on the ground of extreme urgency. According to the Petitioner, he is under a threat of eviction from the said premises pursuant to the Notice dated 2 nd May, 2026 (Exhibit - N to the petition).

3. In this background, we have heard the learned Senior Counsel Mr.Kirti Munshi for the Petitioner, Ms. Smita Tondwalkar for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 - BMC, Mr. Vikramjit Garewal for the Respondent No.5 and Mr. Bhavin Shah for the Respondent Nos.6 to

8.

4. Learned Counsel Ms. Smita Tondwalkar for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 - BMC states that the Notice under Section 354 of the Act has not yet been issued. Accordingly, there appears to be no urgency and/or an apprehension of eviction at this stage.

5. Place the matter in due course. Liberty to move in case of urgency.

SANDESH D. PATIL, J. ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J. Wakodikar 2/2 ::: Uploaded on - 14/05/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 14/05/2026 20:58:33 :::