Bombay High Court
Ravya Manish Punjabi vs State Of Maharashtra on 13 May, 2026
2026:BHC-AS:22542
Digitally
signed by
RUPALI 11a-IA-1628-2026.doc
RUPALI RAJESH
RAJESH WAKODIKAR
WAKODIKAR Date:
2026.05.14
15:35:06
+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1628 OF 2026
IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1199 OF 2026
Ravya Manish Punjabi ...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Sagar Kursija for the Applicant/Intervenor.
Mr. Priayl Sarda a/w Mr. Rajesh Ranglani for the applicants/accused.
Mr. Dinesh J. Haldankar, A.P.P for the Respondent-State.
API - Madhumati Shinde attached to Pimpri Police Station, present.
CORAM : SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 13th MAY, 2026 (VACATION COURT) P.C. :
1. Heard learned Counsel appearing or the applicant/intervenor.
2. This is an application for intervention.Wakodikar 1/2 ::: Uploaded on - 14/05/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 14/05/2026 20:48:08 :::
11a-IA-1628-2026.doc
3. Mr. Sarda, learned Counsel appearing for the original applicant has no objection if the same is allowed. Hence, the said application is allowed.
4. Leave is granted to the learned Counsel for the applicant to carry out amendment in the main application within four weeks from today.
5. Interim Application stands disposed of accordingly.
SANDESH D. PATIL, J.
Wakodikar 2/2 ::: Uploaded on - 14/05/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 14/05/2026 20:48:08 :::