Mrs. Poonam Dilip Jagtap vs Raigad Zilla Parishad Through Ceo

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 78 Bom
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2023

Bombay High Court
Mrs. Poonam Dilip Jagtap vs Raigad Zilla Parishad Through Ceo on 3 January, 2023
Bench: G. S. Kulkarni
PRASHANT
VILAS
RANE
Digitally signed by
PRASHANT VILAS
RANE
Date: 2023.01.04
18:02:53 +0530




      pvr                                                                         5wp2083-16

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  WRIT PETITION NO.2083 OF 2016

          Mrs.Poonam Dilip Jagap                     ... Petitioner
                      Versus
          Raigad Zilla Parishad through CEO.         ...Respondent
                                           AND
                             WRIT PETITION NO.12064 OF 2016
                            (NOT ON BOARD TAKEN ON BOARD)
          Mrs.Sarita Rajesh Mhatre                   ... Petitioner
                              Versus
          Raigad Zilla Parishad through CEO.         ...Respondent

          Mr.Sandeep Dere, for the Petitioner.
          None for the Respondent.
                                 ______________________

                                    CORAM:      G. S. KULKARNI, J.
                                    DATED:      JANUARY 03, 2023
                                       _______________________
          P.C.

1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners. It appears that the challenge raised in the present petitions to the orders passed by the Labour Court, Mahad, dated 23 September 2014 and the Industrial Court, Thane, dated 17 October 2015, is covered by the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court rendered in Writ Petition No.152 of 2016 decided on 21 March 2016 ( Shraddha Sandeep Vengurlekar vs. Raigad Zilla Parishad and Ors). The petitioners in the present proceedings are similarly placed as in the case of the petitioners in the said proceedings, who could not succeed as their petition came to be dismissed by this Court. This position appears to be not disputed.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that it is likely that the 1 of 2

-------------------------

                                              January 3, 2023
 pvr                                                              5wp2083-16

orders passed by this Court in Shraddha Sandeep Vengurlekar vs. Raigad Zilla Parishad and Ors. (supra) are assailed by the said petitioners before the Supreme Court.

3. Be that as it may, as the present proceedings are covered by the order dated 21 March 2016 in the case Shraddha Sandeep Vengurlekar vs. Raigad Zilla Parishad & Ors. (supra), in my opinion, these petitions are also required to be dismissed in terms of the said judgment and order passed by this Court. It is, however clarified that, in the event, if any proceedings pursued before the Supreme Court in the case Shraddha Sandeep Vengurlekar vs. Raigad Zilla Parishad & Ors. (supra) succeed, it would be permissible for the petitioners to revive these petitions, on permissible grounds as may be available to the petitioners in law.

4. With such liberty to the petitioners, the present petitions are dismissed in terms of the order dated 21 March 2016 passed by the co- ordinate Bench of this Court in Shraddha Sandeep Vengurlekar vs. Raigad Zilla Parishad & Ors. (supra). No costs.

G. S. KULKARNI, J 2 of 2

-------------------------

January 3, 2023