The Ex. Engineer, Irri. Proj. ... vs Raghunath Baliram Patil

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 14787 Bom
Judgement Date : 8 October, 2021

Bombay High Court
The Ex. Engineer, Irri. Proj. ... vs Raghunath Baliram Patil on 8 October, 2021
Bench: R. G. Avachat
                                                           906(b)-ca-9647-2021+.odt




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                      CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9647 OF 2021
                              IN FAST/10471/2021

 The Executive Engineer,
 Irrigation Project Strengthening Division
 Omerga and others                                     ... Applicants
        Versus
 Haridas Vishwanath Zambare                            ... Respondents

                                   AND
                   CA/9649/2021 IN FAST/10571/2021
                   CA/9651/2021 IN FAST/10585/2021
                   CA/9653/2021 IN FAST/10575/2021
                   CA/9655/2021 IN FAST/10567/2021
                   CA/9657/2021 IN FAST/10564/2021
                   CA/9659/2021 IN FAST/10578/2021
                   CA/9661/2021 IN FAST/10582/2021
                                    ....
 Mr. R. A. Tambe, Advocate for applicants
 Mr. L. C. Patil, Advocate for respondents-claimants
                                    ....

                                   CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT, J.

DATED : 08th OCTOBER, 2021 PER COURT :-

. Heard.

2. Issue notice to the respondents - claimants, returnable after twelve (12) weeks.


                                                                         1 of 2




::: Uploaded on - 11/10/2021                  ::: Downloaded on - 16/10/2021 22:31:47 :::
                                          (( 2 ))             906(b)-ca-9647-2021+


3. It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the applicant- appellant that the increase or enhancement is manifold i.e. from Rs.245/- to Rs.5,000/- per Are for irrigated land and Rs.3,000/- per Are for unirrigated land. Moreover, interest has been awarded in breach of the Full Bench judgment of this Court in the case of State of Maharashtra v. Kailash Shiva Rangari - AIR 2016 BOMBAY 141. The difference of interest is of five years. The sale instance relied upon pertaining to the land sold in Gunthas and not in Acerage.

4. Learned Advocate for the respondents - claimants would submit that this Court in connected matters has directed to deposit entire amount under the impugned award. It appears that the submissions made by the learned Advocate here had not been made while that order was passed. Hence, for the present on depositing 75% of the amount under the impugned award within a period of twelve (12) weeks from today, execution thereof to stand stayed, pending the appeals.

[ R. G. AVACHAT, J. ] SMS 2 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 11/10/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 16/10/2021 22:31:47 :::