1/2 6.mca.491.2021 in wp.3564.2020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 491 OF 2021
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3564 OF 2020 (DECIDED)
(Ganesh Bhimrao Umredkar V/s State of Maharashtra & Ors.)
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders
Memoranda of Coram,
Appearances, court's
orders or directions and
Prothonotary's orders
Mr. M. V. Bute, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr. A. M. Kadukar, AGP for Respondent - State.
------
CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE &
ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 1, 2021.
. Heard. The contention of learned Counsel for the
Applicant is that this Court while dismissing the Writ Petition No. 3564/2020 on 2nd February, 2021 did not consider the argument that the Scrutiny Committee, without giving any opportunity to the Petitioner to explain the entry of the Petitioner's father dated 23rd April 1941 showing his caste as 'Koshti', rejected the tribe claim of the Petitioner.
2. On going through the Judgment sought to be reviewed by the Applicant, we find that aforesaid argument of learned Counsel for the Petitioner has been duly considered by ::: Uploaded on - 01/10/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 02/10/2021 10:30:27 ::: 2/2 6.mca.491.2021 in wp.3564.2020.odt this Court. Such consideration, could be found in paragraph Nos.4, 5, 6 and 7 of the Judgment sought to be reviewed.
3. Therefore, we are of the view that there is no substance in this Application and it deserves to be rejected summarily.
4. Misc. Civil Application stands rejected summarily.
(ANIL S. KILOR, J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.) Yadav VG ::: Uploaded on - 01/10/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 02/10/2021 10:30:27 :::