fa990.05+
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FIRST APPEAL NO.990 OF 2005
1) Special Land Acquisition Officer (I),
Upper Tapi Project, Hatnur,
Jalgaon,
2) The Executive Engineer,
Waghur Dam Division, Jalgaon,
3) The Collector, Jalgaon.
...APPELLANTS
(Orig. Respondents)
VERSUS
Shri Govinda Namdev Kumawat,
Since deceased through L.R.s,
1) Lilabai Govinda Kumawat,
Age-57 years, Occu:Agriculture,
2) Ramesh Govinda Kumawat,
Age-34 years, Occu:Agriculture,
3) Raju Govinda Kumawat,
Age-30 years, Occu:Agriculture,
4) Subhash Govinda Kumawat,
Age-24 years, Occu:Agriculture,
5) Sau. Kamalabai Mahadu Kumawat,
Age-42 years, Occu:Agriculture,
::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 10/09/2021 10:15:33 :::
fa990.05+
2
6) Sau. Saralabai Janardhan Kumawat,
Age-30 years, Occu:Agriculture,
All R/o-Nerk Bk., Taluka-Jamner,
District-Jalgaon.
...RESPONDENTS
(Orig. Claimants)
...
Mr. S.S. Dande, AGP for Appellants.
None present for Respondents though served.
...
AND
FIRST APPEAL NO.991 OF 2005
1) Special Land Acquisition Officer (I),
Upper Tapi Project, Hatnur,
Jalgaon,
2) The Executive Engineer,
Waghur Dam Division, Jalgaon,
3) The Collector, Jalgaon.
...APPELLANTS
(Orig. Respondents)
VERSUS
1) Amrut Tukaram Patil,
Age-16 years, Occu:Nil,
R/o-Neri Bk., Taluka-Jamner,
District-Jalgaon,
2) Kusumbai Tukaram Patil,
mother Guardian of Amrut Tukaram Patil,
Age-71 years, R/o-Neri Bk.,
Taluka-Jamner, District-Jalgaon.
...RESPONDENTS
(Orig. Claimants)
::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 10/09/2021 10:15:33 :::
fa990.05+
3
...
Mr.B.V. Virdhe, AGP for Appellants.
None present for Respondents though served.
...
AND
FIRST APPEAL NO.992 OF 2005
1) Special Land Acquisition Officer (I),
Upper Tapi Project, Hatnur,
Jalgaon,
2) The Executive Engineer,
Waghur Dam Division, Jalgaon,
3) The Collector, Jalgaon.
...APPELLANT
(Orig. Respondents)
VERSUS
Sanjay Arjun Shelke,
Age-62 years, Occu:Agriculture,
R/o-Neri Bk., Taluka-Jamner,
District-Jalgaon.
...RESPONDENT
(Orig. Claimant)
...
Mr. S.S. Dande, AGP for Appellants.
None present for Respondent though served.
...
AND
::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 10/09/2021 10:15:33 :::
fa990.05+
4
FIRST APPEAL NO.993 OF 2005
1) Special Land Acquisition Officer (I),
Upper Tapi Project, Hatnur,
Jalgaon,
2) The Executive Engineer,
Waghur Dam Division, Jalgaon,
3) The Collector, Jalgaon.
...APPELLANTS
(Orig. Respondents)
VERSUS
Rukhmanbai Pundalik Pathekar,
Since deceased through L.R.s,
1) Deepak Rajendra Bhalerao,
Age-03 years, Occu:Nil,
2) Mahesh Rajendra Bhalerao,
Age-02 years, Occu:Nil,
3) Mangalabai Rajendra Bhalerao,
Age-24 years, Occu:Agriculture,
Applicant No.3 for herself and as
Guardian of applicant No. 1 & 2,
All R/o-Chincholi,
Taluka and District-Jalgaon,
4) Dnyaneshwar Shantaram Patil,
Age-24 years, Occu:Agriculture,
R/o-Chincholi,
Taluka and District-Jalgaon,
5) Bebibai W/o Subhash Waghode,
Age-32 years, Occu:Agriculture,
R/o-Manurabad,
Taluka and District-Jalgaon,
::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 10/09/2021 10:15:33 :::
fa990.05+
5
6) Ratnabai W/o Bapu Sagar,
Age-26 years, Occu:Agriculture,
R/o-Kalamsara, Taluka-Pachora,
District-Jalgaon,
7) Sunanda W/o Uttam Bhalerao,
Age-22 years, Occu:Agriculture,
R/o-Jalandri, Taluka-Jamner,
District-Jalgaon.
8) Yenubai W/o Eknath Shinde,
Age-52 years, Occu:Agriculture,
R/o-Lahasar, Taluka-Jamner,
District-Jalgaon,
9) Mathurabai W/o Namdeo Mahajan,
Age-48 years, Occu:Agriculture,
R/o-Salshingi, Taluka-Bodwad,
District-Jalgaon,
10) Pundalik Goba Pathekar,
Age-78 years, Occu:Nil,
R/o-Neri, Taluka-Jamner,
District-Jalgaon,
Through GPA Raghunath Eknath
Shinde, R/o-Ansar,
Taluka-Jamner, District-Jalgaon.
...RESPONDENTS
(Orig. Claimants)
...
Mr.B.V. Virdhe, AGP for Appellants.
None present for Respondents though served.
...
AND
::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 10/09/2021 10:15:33 :::
fa990.05+
6
FIRST APPEAL NO.994 OF 2005
1) Special Land Acquisition Officer (I),
Upper Tapi Project, Hatnur,
Jalgaon,
2) The Executive Engineer,
Waghur Dam Division, Jalgaon,
3) The Collector, Jalgaon.
...APPELLANTS
(Orig. Respondents)
VERSUS
Jankiram Lotu Ghodape,
Age-53 years, Occu:Agriculture,
R/o-Neri Bk., Taluka-Jamner,
District-Jalgaon.
...RESPONDENT
(Orig. Claimant)
...
Mr. S.S. Dande, AGP for Appellants.
None present for Respondents though served.
...
AND
FIRST APPEAL NO.996 OF 2005
1) Special Land Acquisition Officer (I),
Upper Tapi Project, Hatnur,
Jalgaon,
2) The Executive Engineer,
Waghur Dam Division, Jalgaon,
3) The Collector, Jalgaon.
...APPELLANTS
(Orig. Respondents)
::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 10/09/2021 10:15:33 :::
fa990.05+
7
VERSUS
Gangubai Supdu Kumbahr,
Age-59 years, Occu:Agriculture,
R/o-Neri Bk., Taluka-Jamner,
District-Jalgaon.
...RESPONDENT
(Orig. Claimant)
...
Mr.B.V. Virdhe, AGP for Appellants.
None present for Respondents though served.
...
AND
FIRST APPEAL NO.997 OF 2005
1) Special Land Acquisition Officer (I),
Upper Tapi Project, Hatnur,
Jalgaon,
2) The Executive Engineer,
Waghur Dam Division, Jalgaon,
3) The Collector, Jalgaon.
...APPELLANTS
(Orig. Respondents)
VERSUS
Sakhubai Mohan Kumawat,
Age-58 years, Occu:Agriculture,
R/o-Neri Bk., Taluka-Jamner,
District-Jalgaon.
...RESPONDENT
(Orig. Claimant)
...
Mr.S.S. Dande, AGP for Appellants.
None present for Respondents though served.
...
::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 10/09/2021 10:15:33 :::
fa990.05+
8
AND
FIRST APPEAL NO.998 OF 2005
1) Special Land Acquisition Officer (I),
Upper Tapi Project, Hatnur,
Jalgaon,
2) The Executive Engineer,
Waghur Dam Division, Jalgaon,
3) The Collector, Jalgaon.
...APPELLANTS
(Orig. Respondents)
VERSUS
Shamrao Bandu Kumawat,
Age-69 years, Occu:Agriculture,
R/o-Neri Bk., Taluka-Jamner,
District-Jalgaon.
...RESPONDENT
(Orig. Claimant)
...
Mr.B.V. Virdhe, AGP for Appellants.
None present for Respondent.
...
AND
FIRST APPEAL NO.999 OF 2005
1) Special Land Acquisition Officer (I),
Upper Tapi Project, Hatnur,
Jalgaon,
2) The Executive Engineer,
Waghur Dam Division, Jalgaon,
::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 10/09/2021 10:15:33 :::
fa990.05+
9
3) The Collector, Jalgaon.
...APPELLANTS
(Orig. Respondents)
VERSUS
Shri Laxman Kautik Divare,
Since deceased through L.R.s,
1) Rukhmanbai Laxman Divare,
Age-45 years, Occu:Agriculture,
2) Aasha Murlidhar Patil,
Age-23 years, Occu:Nil,
3) Usha Vilas Patil,
Age-21 years, Occu:Nil,
4) Chhaya Laxman Divare,
Age-23 years, Occu:Nil,
5) Ranjana Laxman Divare,
Age-21 years, Occu:Nil,
6) Avinash Laxman Divare,
Age-18 years, Occu:Nil,
All R/o-Kusumba,
Taluka and District-Jalgaon.
...RESPONDENTS
(Orig. Claimants)
...
Mr. S.S. Dande, AGP for Appellants.
None present for Respondents though served.
...
CORAM: ANIL S. KILOR, J.
DATE : 5th MAY, 2021 ::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 10/09/2021 10:15:33 ::: fa990.05+ 10 ORAL ORDER : 1. The present Appeals are arising out of the
Judgments and Award dated 30th April 2005 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalgaon, in Land Acquisition Reference Nos.184 of 2001, 183 of 2001, 182 of 2001, 174 of 2001, 176 of 2001, 188 of 2001, 191 of 2001, 177 of 2001 and 186 of 2001, enhancing the amount of compensation for the acquired lands. All these appeals are arising out of the same project and same acquisition proceedings.
2. The lands in question are acquired for the purpose of submergence of Waghur Project, District-Jalgaon. The Section 4 Notification was issued on 12 th June 1997. Thereafter, Award was passed on 13th March 2000. Feeling dis- satisfied with the amount of compensation granted by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, References were preferred under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in which the amount has been enhanced to the tune of Rs.1,22,000/- per hectare from Rs./-77,400/-. The said Judgments and Awards are under challenge in these Appeals. ::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 10/09/2021 10:15:33 :::
fa990.05+ 11
3. I have heard the learned AGP for the appellant- State of Maharashtra. None present for the respondents- claimants.
4. The only ground challenging the impugned Judgments and Awards is that, the amount granted by the learned Reference Court is exorbitant and further the learned Reference Court failed to consider the sale instances considered by the Special Land Acquisition Officer while issuing the awards.
5. To consider the contentions raised by the learned AGP, I have gone through the record and proceedings and also perused the impugned Judgments and Awards.
6. After going through the Judgments and Awards, it is reveled that the learned Reference Court has scrutinized the oral as well as documentary evidence available on record in detail, while determining the market value. The learned ::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 10/09/2021 10:15:33 ::: fa990.05+ 12 Reference Court has also considered the relevant factors which are to be taken into consideration as per the well settled principles of law, while arriving at a just and fair compensation.
7. Learned Reference Court relied upon the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Trivenidevi vs. Collector1, and accordingly considered various factors and guidelines together with methodology to arrive at a finding regarding market value, which is recorded in Para 15 of the impugned Judgment. The learned Reference Court also considered the other Judgments of the Apex Court and the High Courts and recorded its appreciation of oral as well as documentary evidence in Para 25 onwards of the Judgment. It was observed that there were as many as 60 transactions of sale instances of lands between the period from 11th June 1994 to 12th June 1997 and the market value was ranging from Rs.37037/- per hectare upto Rs.6,60,060/- per hectare. The learned Reference Court, taking the sale instances from the proximity angle of time, decided the 1 AIR 1972 SC 1417 ::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 10/09/2021 10:15:33 ::: fa990.05+ 13 market value as Rs.1,22,000/- per hectare, which according to me, is just and fair.
8. Nothing has been brought on record by the appellant in these matters to show contrary or to show perversity in the findings recorded by the learned Reference Court. In that view of the matter, I do not find any merit in the present matters.
9. Moreover, there is one additional reason for dismissal of these appeals and the same is that, now, i n view of the policy decision of the State Government, as per Government Resolution dated 3rd November 2016 and corrigendum issued to the to the same, whereby it was resolved not to file or contest any appeal wherein the amount is well within four times. There is no dispute that in these matters enhanced amount of compensation is well within four times than the amount awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and therefore, on this count also, I do not find any reason to interfere with the Judgments and awards impugned in the present matters.
::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 10/09/2021 10:15:33 :::
fa990.05+ 14
10. Thus, for the reasons recorded herein above, I do not find any error committed by the learned Reference Court in these matters. Accordingly all the Appeals are dismissed. No order as to costs. Pending Civil Applications, if any, are also disposed of.
[ANIL S. KILOR, J.] asb/MAY21 ::: Uploaded on - 06/05/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 10/09/2021 10:15:33 :::