Anjanabai Ramchandra Bavaskar ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr Its ...

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5865 Bom
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2021

Bombay High Court
Anjanabai Ramchandra Bavaskar ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr Its ... on 1 April, 2021
Bench: Anil S. Kilor
                                    1                      961-CA-5208-20-w.odt




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          BENCH AT AURANGABAD



        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5208 OF 2020 IN FA/1697/2019

                BHALCHANDRA GANPAT CHAVAN AND OTHERS
                                VERSUS
                   STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                  ...

        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5209 OF 2020 IN FA/1696/2019

                          GOVINDA KASHIRAM PATIL
                                  VERSUS
                     STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                    ...

        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5211 OF 2020 IN FA/1700/2019

                          GOVINDA KASHIRAM PATIL
                                  VERSUS
                     STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                    ...

        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5215 OF 2020 IN FA/1704/2019

                    CHHAGAN DAMU SHINDE AND ANOTHER
                                 VERSUS
                    STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                   ...

        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5212 OF 2020 IN FA/1705/2019

                         KAMALBAI BHUWAN SHINDE
                                  VERSUS
                     STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                    ...

        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5210 OF 2020 IN FA/1706/2019

                        JANARDHAN WAMAN GANDHELE
                                  VERSUS
                     STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                    ...




::: Uploaded on - 05/04/2021              ::: Downloaded on - 04/09/2021 17:21:50 :::
                                     2                      961-CA-5208-20-w.odt



        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5214 OF 2020 IN FA/1707/2019

           NATHU RAMKRISHNA PATIL (GEN.MU) AND ANOTHER
                             VERSUS
                STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                ...

        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5213 OF 2020 IN FA/1709/2019

                       VASANT NARAYAN JAGTAP DIED
                    THROUGH LRS ANJANABAI AND OTHERS
                                 VERSUS
                    STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                   ...

        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5225 OF 2020 IN FA/1710/2019

                TAPIRAM GOBA PATIL (GEN.MU.) AND OTHERS
                                VERSUS
                   STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                   ...

        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5229 OF 2020 IN FA/1711/2019

                CHANDRAKANT PANDIT SHINDE AND OTHERS
                               VERSUS
                  STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                 ...

        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5226 OF 2020 IN FA/1712/2019

                           RAMESH LAXMAN PAWAR
                                  VERSUS
                     STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                    ...

        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5228 OF 2020 IN FA/1713/2019

                           BHUWAN DAMU SHINDE
                                  VERSUS
                     STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                    ...

        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5224 OF 2020 IN FA/1715/2019

                           ATMARAM NATHU JAGTAP
                                  VERSUS
                     STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS


::: Uploaded on - 05/04/2021              ::: Downloaded on - 04/09/2021 17:21:50 :::
                                          3                            961-CA-5208-20-w.odt



                                 ...
        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5227 OF 2020 IN FA/1716/2019

                      RATIRAM KASHIRAM PATIL
                              VERSUS
                STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                 ...
        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5218 OF 2020 IN FA/1718/2019

      ANJANABAI RAMCHANDRA BAVASKAR (DIED) AND OTHERS
                                VERSUS
               STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                   ...
                      In All the above matters -
         Advocate for Applicants-claimants : Mr. Vijay B. Patil
       AGP for Respondents - State and SLAO : Mr. R. B. Bagul
 Advocate for Respondent-Acquiring Body : Mrs. Chaitali R. Kutti Choudhary
                                        ...

                                             CORAM :         ANIL S. KILOR, J.
                                             DATE      :     1st APRIL, 2021
PER COURT :-

Heard learned respective counsels appearing for the parties.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant-Acquiring Body informs in this court that some amount has been deposited in the Reference Court, in pursuant to the Judgment and Award passed by the Reference Court and some amount is deposited in this Court. However, no definite statement is made that how much amount is deposited out of the total amount.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant-claimants submits that as per the instructions received by him, 57% amount of the decreetal amount is deposited by the Acquiring Body in the High Court as well as in the Reference Court. Learned counsel for the applicant-claimants seeks permission to withdraw the amount ::: Uploaded on - 05/04/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 04/09/2021 17:21:50 ::: 4 961-CA-5208-20-w.odt for the reasons stated in the applications. He submits that the applicants-claimants are in need of money and, therefore, request of the applicants be considered.

4. In view of the fact that, part of the amount towards compensation is deposited in the Reference Court and part of the amount deposited in this Court, however, no definite statement is made as regards how much amount is deposited, I proceed to pass the following order -

a) The civil applications are allowed.

(i) The applicants-claimants are permitted to withdraw 50% of the total decreetal amount deposited by Acquiring Body.

In case, the amount deposited by Acquiring Body in the Reference Court as well as in this Court is less than 50% of the complete / entire amount, the applicant- claimants are permitted to withdraw the same on furnishing undertaking to the effect that, if the Acquiring Body succeeds in the present matter and this Court directs the applicants-claimants to repay the amount back, they will deposit the amount so withdrawn within stipulated period.

However, in case, the deposited amount is more ::: Uploaded on - 05/04/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 04/09/2021 17:21:50 ::: 5 961-CA-5208-20-w.odt than 50%, the applicants are permitted to withdraw 50% amount on furnishing undertaking to the effect that, if the Acquiring Body succeeds in the present matter and this Court directs the applicants-claimants to repay the amount back, they will deposit the amount so withdrawn within stipulated period.

5. The civil applications are disposed of, accordingly.

( ANIL S. KILOR ) JUDGE mtk ::: Uploaded on - 05/04/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 04/09/2021 17:21:50 :::